Kirby Dick and Eddie Schmidt have come up with another
fantastic documentary, this time turning the camera on the last
group members of the Motion Picture Academy of America probably
want to see on the big screen: themselves. The director and
producer spent more than a year investigating the MPAA ratings
board and its system to create This Film Is Not Yet Rated, even
hiring a private investigation company to find and follow
raters. Mr Schmidt (on the right, below; that's Kirby Dick on
the left), who grew up in Newtown, will be in Bethel this
weekend to introduce the film. -photo courtesy IFC Films
The ratings system for movies released in the United States has
drawn fire for years from directors, especially when a film
receives a rating from The Motion Picture Association of America
(MPAA) that the director doesn't agree with. Too high of a rating
(R or NC-17, for instance) may mean that audiences will shy away
from the film because they fear too much violence or strong
language. A rating that's too low (G or PG-13) may keep adults
away, thinking the film will be to simple for them.
There is also a lot of money at stake when a film receives a
higher-than-expected rating, especially NC-17. That rating can be
crippling because studios can't - or won't - spend money on a
film that is restricted to most audiences. Ratings affect a
film's distribution, which affects its success, which in turn
affects what kind of movies get made and what the public gets to
see at the local movie theater.
Who comes up with the ratings for films? Who are the members of
the MPAA ratings board and what are their standards?
Those questions have vexed directors and moviegoers alike since
1922, when the MPAA was founded. Directors have tried to fight
the MPAA board to have ratings eased, but have found time and
again that in order to meet MPAA's "suggested rating," they - the
directors - have to reedit their own work. That's something any
director hates to do.
Perhaps even worse is the fact that everything is done is such
secrecy. Of movie boards from 30 countries, the MPAA is the only
group that does not disclose who its members are. These people
are not judges, CIA or FBI agents, nor even undercover police
officers. These are ten people who sit in a pink building in Los
Angeles that is patrolled and guarded, surrounded by high fences,
who decide what should be seen by the rest of the country.
A few years ago, director Kirby Dick and producer Eddie Schmidt -
the same team behind the Academy Award-nominated documentary
Twist of Faith - decided to do some serious investigating
into the MPAA and its ratings system. The result is the
documentary This Film Is Not Yet Rated.
A few minutes into the film, the names of directors whose work
has been altered or crippled due to the ratings start filling the
screen. These are some of the biggest names in filmdom including
Peter Jackson, Stanley Kubrick, Wes Craven, Amy Heckerling, Jane
Campion and countless others; by the time the names stop filling
the screen the words are so small it's difficult to read all of
them. But viewers get the idea: Big or small, directors are
affected. The system is broken.
"After Twist of Faith, we wanted to take on something
equally important in culture," Mr Schmidt said this week. The
Newtown native will be in Bethel this weekend to introduce his
film when it opens at Bethel Cinema. The film opened on September
1 in LA and New York, and has been making its way into more
theaters during the past month. Well before its release five
weeks ago, there was a lot of buzz about the film. How much
information would these guys actually find out about the
commission?
"This one, however, has a lot of humor and is a little more
outrageous. It's also entertaining, which it needs to be, since
it's about movies."
Twist of Faith, released in January 2005, told the story
of Tony Comes of Toledo, Ohio, a 34-year old husband, father,
firefighter, and loyal Catholic who is forced to face his past
when he learns that Father Dennis Gray - a Catholic priest who
Comes says abused him as a child - is living five doors away from
Mr Comes and his family. The film follows Mr Comes as he goes
public with his story, first as John Doe and then with his given
name, and the repercussions within his home and the Toledo
community of his difficult decision.
Mr Schmidt will introduce the 3:30 screening of This Film Is
Not Yet Rated on Saturday, October 7, and then he'll stick
around for a question and answer session following the film.
Director Kirby Dick interviewed filmmakers, critics, attorneys,
authors and educators for This Film... Filmmakers who
speak candidly include John Waters (A Dirty Shame), Kevin
Smith (Clerks), Matt Stone (South Park), Kimberly
Peirce (Boys Don't Cry), Atom Egoyan (Where the Truth
Lies), Darren Aronofsky (Requiem for a Dream), Mary
Harron (American Psycho), actress Maria Bello (The
Cooler), and distributor Bingham Ray (co-founder, October
Films and former president, United Artists). The two even managed
to find two former MPAA ratings board members to speak on camera.
Mr Schmidt was surprised, he said Tuesday afternoon, at some of
the people who declined to be interviewed for their project.
"Both studio people and independent filmmakers who had spoken in
the press before, people we thought would be a slam-dunk for the
movie, declined because they didn't want to appear in a film
giving their harsh appearance," he said. Directors who did speak
out, however, had plenty to say about the system they feel has
censored them.
John Waters called Blockbuster "the worst censorship of all.
Wal-Mart, Blockbuster, all the big chains that are probably
responsible for 40 percent of all videos sold, DVDs, will not
carry NC-17" rated films. In essence, these companies are not
allowing their consumers to choose for themselves what they will
watch at home.
Matt Stone, one half of the team that has given us South
Park and is no stranger to controversy, also had plenty to
say about the MPAA, its ratings system and the effect those
ratings have on all levels of the film industry.
"They serve the studios," he says of the ratings board. "That's
who pays their bills, that's who they are. They are the
studios."
Mr Stone also charges that the MPAA treats big-studio films and
their companies better than they treat the independent
filmmakers.
"When we submitted Orgazmo [released in 1997 by October
Films], we only were told to re-cut and resubmit it. No
explanation, no details," Mr Stone said. "By the time we did
South Park [the movie] and were working with Paramount,
they gave us a line-by-line description of what to do to achieve
an R rating after our first attempt came back NC-17."
As has been the case with MPAA for decades, when Mr Dick and Mr
Kirby attempted to contact members of the Academy and many people
associated with studios, they didn't get a response.
"Nobody in the studio system wanted to talk with us -
postproduction supervisors, they did not want to be in the film
at all," Mr Schmidt said. "We tried. We also tried to get Dan
Glickman and Jack Valenti to do interviews, and got no response."
Mr Glickman has been president of the MPAA since September 1,
2004.
Mr Valenti created the MPAA rating system in 1968 and served as
the association's president for more than 34 years, always
closely guarding the identities of his ratings board members. A
polished advocate for the movie studios, he is still one of the
most powerful men in Hollywood.
"Their fears," Mr Schmidt said, referring again to his fellow
filmmakers, "made us want to make the film that much more. If
there's a system within the industry that's so important, but
people are scared of talking about it, that drove our quest even
further. It put more gas in the engine: I have to expose this.
The greatest filmmakers of our time should not be afraid of the
judgment of ten anonymous people.
"If there were an equivalent system in the world of book or fine
art, people would be up in arms. It's only because films are
perceived as entertainment - if great paintings had to pass, or
be trimmed - people wouldn't put up with it," he added.
The Dick-Schmidt team also worked with a private investigator and
ultimately manages to uncover one of Hollywood's best-kept
secrets.
"We really wanted to open peoples' minds. This system is bad," Mr
Schmidt said. "It's been in place for a long time and people just
accept it at face value. We thought that parents, and educators,
and just filmgoers should know what they're not seeing, and why,
and demand an answer from an anonymous, secretive body that's
making these determinations for them."
Ironically, the film qualifies for and has been submitted for a
Academy Award. It has been released as an unrated film; the MPAA
gave it an NC-17 when it was submitted, a process that was
followed during the filming of This Film.
"It's been submitted to the Academy, so we'll see" if they give
the film a nod for a nomination. "Does Hollywood want to send a
message to Hollywood? That's what we're waiting to see," said Mr
Schmidt. "There are factions that want to let the old guard at
the industry know that the ratings board needs to be changed."
Bethel Cinema is at 269 Greenwood Avenue; telephone
778-3100. This Film Is Not Yet Rated will be screened
daily until at least Thursday, October 12.
The film's website (IFC.com/NotYetRated) offers a synopsis of
the film, Mr Schmidt's blog and even a petition calling for the
MPAA to restructure - and publicize - its ratings system.