NHS Boys' Lacrosse Team Wins Two-Coach Adams Likes What He Sees As Nighthawks Put Pedal To Medal, Get Back To Winning Ways

By ANDY HUTCHISON

Published: Apr 30, 2010 12:00 am

NHS Boysâ Lacrosse Team Wins Twoâ

Coach Adams Likes What He Sees As Nighthawks Put Pedal To Medal, Get Back To Winning Ways

By Andy Hutchison

After enduring a couple of one-goal setbacks, in which Coach Glenn Adams believed his team did not put in a full four-quarter effort either time, the Nighthawks played eight straight solid quarters in a pair of lopsided wins to get back on track.

Sure the competition â Stratford and Masuk of Monroe â was not the same as Conard and Weston, the only teams to beat Newtown in seven games, but a through effort is a thorough effort. Newtown defeated Stratford 16-1 on the road on April 23 and toppled visiting Masuk 21-6 under a steady rain at Treadwell Park on April 26.

Newtown built a 10-0 halftime lead on Stratford and carried a commanding 15-4 cushion into the break against Masuk and cruised through the second half of each of those wins.

Against Masuk, Tim Dalton scored five goals, Justin Brophy netted a three-goal hat-trick, and Colby Summerlin, Will Northrop, Trey Trudell, Ryan Korth, and Zach Dent all scored twice.

Lewis Thompson had a goal and four assists â marking the second straight game in which he has played the role of playmaker to the tune of four setups.

âIt was definitely a pick-me-up that our team needed,â Dalton said. âI think we definitely played four quarters today.â

The Nighthawks controlled 15 of 25 face-offs and Summerlin, Dan Hebert, and Dylan Huebner all scooped five ground balls to help the Nighthawks maintain possession throughout much of the afternoon.

âWe played our game â won the ground ball battles, played solid defense, and on offense we were patient with the ball, didnât have a lot of turnovers on offense,â Adams said after the win over Masuk.

âI think today was kind of a turning point for us. We got back to playing our game and we did it for a full, basically, 48 minutes,â Adams added. âAnd thatâs our goal â thatâs what we wanted to do and basically, from now on out, weâre going to use this as a turning point to build on every single day.â

Newtown, following Wednesdayâs scheduled game at New Milford (after The Bee sports section went to press) will return home in early May for scheduled games with Brookfield and Old Lyme in back-to-back contests at Blue & Gold Stadium. The Brookfield game is tentatively scheduled for May 3 at 7 pm and Old Lyme visits for a non-conference battle on May 5 at 6 pm.

The Way We Were

Top Of The Mountain

My Brother’s Band Planning ‘Mixed Bag’ Set List For Summer Concert Series Gig

Theater Review: A Very Happy Homecoming For ‘All Shook Up’

Theater Review: ‘Camelot’ Given The Royal Treatment In Neighboring Brookfield

It’s important to clarify the tone and context of Derek Pisani’s remarks, particularly the satirical line about suing Newtown for "Gross Stupidity." This was clearly a tongue-in-cheek jab at the exhausting culture of legal threats that’s become a staple on the local Facebook Group forums. It was a reflection of frustration over endless regulatory hurdles and obstructionism, and the desire to avoid common sense solutions not an insult aimed at residents. Satire, is meant to provoke thought and highlight the absurdities. If we are unable to distinguish between satire and literal threats, perhaps the comment hit closer to the truth than we’d like to admit. Rather than focusing on Pisanis style, we should be discussing the substance of what he’s pointing out: that Newtown’s progress is being routinely blocked by a small but vocal contingent who seem intent on saying “no” at every turn. They are saying no to any development, no to common sense solutions to crowd control, etc. Newtown deserves leaders who are willing to call things as they see them, even if their language ruffles feathers. That doesn’t mean they lack respect for constituents—it means they care enough to challenge the Mob and push for solutions. Isn't that what we elect people to do? I applaud Pisani's dedication, he certainly has earned my vote. Regardless, let’s not reduce conversation to tone-policing and outrage. Let’s focus on the issues that matter.

Who is Calling Newtowners Stupid?

Thank you for pointing out the trail access provisions included in the BOS motion—it’s an important clarification that deserves more attention in this conversation. If the development is, in fact, required to provide permanent free public access and commit to ongoing maintenance of this section of the Rochambeau Trail, that is a remarkably beneficial outcome for the town. oIt’s not every day that a private project shoulders the long-term burden of preserving and caring for a public historical corridor at no taxpayer cost—especially one that previously had no formal access, upkeep, or visibility. Let’s be honest: the idea that the only way to protect history is by preventing any development nearby is a rigid and unworkable standard. What’s being proposed here appears to strike a rare balance—historic preservation, public access, and smart development all rolled into one. That’s not a loss its a win. So rather than allowing a handful of voices to derail progress under the banner of “historic purity,” maybe it’s time to acknowledge the reality: this trail is better off with structured stewardship and visibility than remaining an overgrown ghost on old maps. Let’s move forward. Bring in the easement, bring in the public access—and yes, bring in the bulldozers!!! Progress and preservation can coexist. Let’s not let the NIMBY use fear or nostalgia keep us stuck in the past.

Discusses Rochambeau Trail And 6 Commerce Road

I've heard that several people are under the impression that the public might be banned from the Rochambeau Trail. Points 2 and 3 from the BOS motion (included in full below) make it clear that public access to the trail is part of the requirements for the developer. From what I understand, it requires free public access to the trail in perpetuity. Technically, this could be argued to be a "payment-in-kind," that attempts to balance public good with overall town growth. We can argue about weather that balance is acceptable and how the trail may be affected, but with the understanding that the trail is expected to be maintained as a publicly accessible trail regardless. July 15, 2024 Board of Selectmen approved motion: Discontinuance of Reservoir Road: Selectman Cruson moved the resolution: Resolved, that the Newtown Board of Selectmen, in accordance with Section 2-115(d)(8) of the Town Charter and Conn. Gen. Stat. §13a-49, and subject to the conditions set forth below, hereby discontinues an unimproved portion of Reservoir Road described as “Portion of Reservoir Road to be Discontinued “on that certain survey map which will be recorded on the Newtown Land Records titled “Map Showing Portion of Reservoir Road to be Discontinued” dated August, 2023 and revised September 15, 2023, and certified substantially correct by Gregory Szyszowski of SLR (the “Survey Map”), said discontinuance contingent and effective only upon the completion of the following: 1. The approval of an application for the development of land in the manner described in a letter from Attorney Thomas W. Beecher to First Selectman A. Jeffrey Capeci and Members of the Board of Selectmen dated May 30, 2024, pursuant to the “Residential Open Space Development” regulations of the Borough of Newtown by the Borough of Newtown Zoning Commission, and construction of that approval project within the timeframes required for special exception approval; 2. The inclusion of the discontinued portion of the road as part of the final Declaration of Conservation Restriction; 3. The conveyance of a mutually agreeable public easement to the Town of Newtown for pedestrian, bicycling, equestrian, and all other passive recreational uses (to exclude the use of motorized vehicles except as may be necessary by the Town or its designee to effectuate the purpose of the easement), and for municipal utility purposes; Be it further resolved, that Castle Hill Real Estate Holdings, LLC., its successors and assigns, shall not use any portion of the discontinued road as a vehicular road or access way to and from any developed portions of the property. Be it further finally resolved, that should any of the foregoing contingencies not occur, then the discontinuance contemplated herein shall not become effective and this resolution will become null and void. From: https://www.newtown-ct.gov/sites/g/files/vyhlif12216/f/minutes/bos_7-15-24_min-_att_final.pdf

Is this paper road (roads that only exist on paper map but not in reality) even owned by the Town? Many roads that predate the Town's road standards are privately owned and were never accepted by the Town, such as many of the nonconforming roads around the lake communities where the property owners own right to the center line. That is something we had to deal with when working on the Roads Ordinance a few years back. We also had to deal with a private road to run the utilities to the new SHS.

For anyone who wants to know, I cant post a link here, but Housatonic Resources Recovery Authority has an entire website. Look up "HRRA whats in whats out"

I Get It!

<< Jul 2025 >>
S	M	T	W	T	F	S
29	30	1	2	3	4	5
6	7	8	9	10	11	12
13	14	15	16	17	18	19
20	21	22	23	24	25	26
27	28	29	30	31	1	2

Log In

NHS Boys' Lacrosse Team Wins Two-Coach Adams Likes What He Sees As Nighthawks Put Pedal To Medal, Get Back To Winning Ways

Leave a Reply Cancel reply