Log In


Reset Password
Archive

Newtown's Tilt Toward Development

Print

Tweet

Text Size


Newtown’s Tilt Toward Development

To the Editor:

Business as usual or sleazy politics? I’m not sure which one of these titles best describes our local political culture in Newtown regarding Fairfield Hills and the little concern over increased development changing our local landscape.

Regarding Fairfield Hills, much gratitude and appreciation can be given to the group the Friends of Fairfield Hills who have worked hard for the people of Newtown in trying to preserve the land, some structures, and include the participation of the local community in the process. Unfortunately their efforts and our local community votes have been thwarted by the selectman and other elected officials with a political end-run game ultimately around the townspeople and the organized group Friends of Fairfield Hills.

I am discouraged as a citizen of Newtown with the involvement of Rep Wasserman and Sen McKinny helping our selectman with his end-run agenda by introducing legislation in Hartford. Legislation that only affects Newtown. This new legislation allows Mr Rosenthal free rein in appointing people and making his own Fairfield Hills committee. We can thank our local representative and senator for taking the vote away from the people. However I thought political representatives were representatives of the people, not the selectman. What can one surmise about such legislation? Do our representatives and those involved in town government have a different interest for Fairfield Hills than the people? For that matter, all of Newtown?

I believe that our selectman and some people on the various town committees are heavily biased towards development of Fairfield Hills as well as all of Newtown. A perfect example is the current plan of Fairfield Hills, which was very similar to the plan voted down by the people in 2003, hence the new legislation which discontinued the people’s vote and participation. The polls that were conducted and paid for by the people of Newtown have shown citizens do not want to develop Fairfield Hills. Furthermore, there have been many letters to the editor and particularly in some of the more recent issues of The Bee regarding over development and the destruction of Newtown’s rural character.

Who’s accountable? Why does Newtown continue to rapidly develop? Are the policies and politics of the Fairfield Hills situation representative of Newtown’s pro-development direction, and are they representative of the personal interests of those people on the various town committees? Can one assume that some committee members may desire more houses with a growing population which result in the need for more auto sales, more legal help, more electrical contracts, more financial help, more papers sold, more insurance coverage, etc? Do these new services and demands monetarily help some committee members’ own business interests? More important, is it too late for the people of Newtown to demand more accountability and an unbiased monitoring of its representatives? Will there be more special legislation introduced in Hartford regarding Newtown? What about a vote and voice concerning the direction of the people’s tax dollars or shall we settle with public sector investment for private sector profit?

John Peeling

119 Poverty Hollow Road, Newtown                             June 27, 2005

Comments
Comments are open. Be civil.
0 comments

Leave a Reply