Date: Fri 09-May-1997
Date: Fri 09-May-1997
Publication: Bee
Author: ANDYG
Quick Words:
P&Z-open-space-regulations
Full Text:
P&Z Considers Revision Of Open Space Requirements
B Y A NDREW G OROSKO
Planning and Zoning Commission (P&Z) members are considering ways to sharpen
the town's land use regulations to ensure that desirable open space land is
donated by developers.
P&Z members May 1 briefly discussed formulating additional open space rules to
more explicitly state what type of land the P&Z prefers for open space use.
Residential developers typically donate at least 10 percent of a subdivided
parcel for open space use by the general public. The land typically is donated
to either the town or the Newtown Forest Association, a local land
conservation group.
Elizabeth Stocker, the P&Z's land use adviser, said the wording to be added to
the P&Z's open space rules will list town priorities in terms of open space
submissions.
Also, when applicants for residential developments meet with P&Z members at
pre-submission sessions, the topic of what land in a parcel would make for
suitable open space would be addressed, Ms Stocker said.
Spelling out what the town wants in the way of open space would give
developers clear guidance in proposing open space donations, she said.
Also, such regulations would provide a standard of reference for the changing
members of the P&Z, she said.
"Newtown has, so far, avoided the worst aspects of urban sprawl largely due to
the rolling aspect of the terrain which discourages sprawling development, the
limitations of water and sewer development, and zoning restrictions on lot
sizes," Ms Stocker writes in a memo to the P&Z.
"There is strong appreciation for the town's remaining rural character and...
open space ranks high on the list of community assets. There is clearly an
opportunity at hand to protect the character of the community and guide the
placement of future open space areas which will preserve key natural features
and serve as recreational resources. By providing guidelines and a pro-active
policy for use in determining where open space parcels will be located within
a development, the community will realize the open space and recreation goals
and objectives of the plan of development," Ms Stocker writes.
Following talks earlier this year with P&Z members, Ms Stocker drafted
proposed open space regulations for discussion purposes.
In that document, it was proposed that P&Z members consider open space
donations in terms of: whether the open space donation connects with other
pieces of existing or proposed open space for pedestrian, bicycle and bridle
paths; whether the donation expands open space and recreational areas on
adjoining properties; whether the donation conserves and protects wildlife
habitat areas, natural and scenic resources, and historical and archaeological
resources; and whether the donation meets neighborhood and community
recreational needs.
Last year, the Newtown Neighborhoods Coalition, a citizens group concerned
about the rapid pace of local residential development, proposed a variety of
land use rule changes to more strictly control growth.
Among those changes, coalition members proposed that 10 percent of "quality"
land with subdivisions be designated as open space. The term "quality" land
was synonymous with "buildable" land, according to the coalition. Some
coalition members had proposed that 20 percent of a subdivision be designated
as open space.
The coalition's desire for "buildable" land as open space resulted from the
fact that sometimes developers donate land such as swamps, rock ledge, and
very steep slopes as open space.
P&Z members didn't endorse the coalition's proposal, but said they would
develop revised open space regulations.
At the May 21 P&Z session, P&Z member Heidi Winslow said she wants open space
regulations for the town which have more "teeth" in them than those under
consideration at the meeting.
She recommended that the P&Z's criteria for accepting open space have
rank-ordered priorities. "I feel strongly about this," she told P&Z members in
saying she will attempt to fashion revised open space regulations for their
consideration.
The P&Z must make it clear to developers that it has the authority to require
donations of certain types of open space land, she said.
It is important to have new parcels of open space land connect to existing
open space, said P&Z member James Boylan.
Mr Boylan said he would like to see other types of land besides wetlands
donated as open space.