Celebrate 60 Years Of ScrabbleÂ® With A Birthday Tournament

By SHANNON HICKS

Published: Nov 28, 2008 12:00 am

DANBURY â Few people have not played Scrabble, a game invented in the 1930s by Alfred Mosher Butts under the name Criss-Crosswords. His friend James Brunot of Newtown decided it was worth the attempt to market it.

Brunot gave the game a few finishing touches, rearranged the premium squares, simplified the rules, and renamed it Scrabble. The copyright application was granted on December 1, 1948.

The trademark was formally registered on December 16, 1948, making 2008 the gameâs 60th birthday. From his home in Newtown, to an old schoolhouse in nearby Dodgingtown, Brunot and his wife tried to keep up with the enormous demands of people looking to play the game.

Since then, ScrabbleÂ® has become one of the best-loved board games in the world. To celebrate 60 years of ScrabbleÂ® there will be a special Birthday ScrabbleÂ® Tournament December 12-14 at the Holiday Inn, 80 Newtown Road.

Serious players can play 16 tournament games over the three days; newcomers to the game may play in a special four-game tournament Saturday, December 12. ScrabbleÂ® enthusiasts of all ages are welcome to watch see the games, pick up free tournament rules, learn about local clubs and tournaments, find ScrabbleÂ® equipment, and even see a special ScrabbleÂ® History display.

The tournament will run Friday, December 12, from 7:30 to 11:30 pm; Saturday, December 13, from 9:30 am to 6:30 pm; and Sunday, December 14, from 9:30 am to 2 pm.

The Newcomersâ Tournament, open to new players and players rated under 1000, will be on Saturday between 9:30 and 1:30. All ages are welcome, though the tournament is not recommended for children under ten.

Entries must be made in advance, preferably prior to December 1; no entries will be accepted after December 8. For information about entering, contact Cornelia Guest, the tournament director, at 203-244-5324 or CornyTisi@aol.com.

Trump Orders Flags Lowered For Minneapolis Catholic School Shooting

My Backyard Habitat: Celebrating Our Native Bees

16-Year-Old Entrepreneur To Moderate ‘Timeless Newtown’ Series Finale

Patricia Anzellotti

Fire Reports | August 13-19, 2025

It seems a lot of the discussion around the flagpole focuses on vilifying drivers who pass on the right, but the real issue is being overlooked. If Chapter 248 Section 14-251 were enforced, we wouldn’t see this problem to begin with. That statute prohibits stopping in the middle of a roadway to yield to cross traffic—as so often happens with cars waiting to turn from Church Hill. When vehicles stop illegally in the travel lane, they effectively create a blockage. Other drivers then either sit through unnecessary delays or carefully pass around them on the right, which is fully permitted when the vehicle ahead is “illegally parked” in the roadway. Instead of punishing drivers reacting to the obstruction, enforcement should focus on the cause: vehicles unlawfully stopping and backing up traffic in the first place. If that behavior were addressed, the need to “go around” would largely disappear.

Borough Board of Burgesses Continues Traffic Safety Discussion

John, you raise an important point — these situations are tragic, complicated, and often far less clear-cut than the headlines make them seem. In the Fredericksburg case, the full facts still aren’t publicly known, and like so many of these stories, there’s conflicting information. It was apparently the back door at 3 a.m. — was it justified to use deadly force? We don’t know yet. What we do know is that the homeowner has been charged, and as you rightly noted, that is very serious. But this is also where perspective matters. These cases are quickly sensationalized in the news and on social media, yet when the dust settles, the outcomes are rarely publicized. People forget that in our system, you are innocent until proven guilty. Try to find much coverage of the convication in the case of the Fairfield Realtor vehicle homicide, or updates on the woman who shot her husband a couple of Christmases ago, or even the pedestrian death in Sandy Hook a year or so back. The follow-through simply isn’t there, and public opinion is often shaped only by the first round of headlines. At the end of the day, these situations remind us how split-second decisions in the middle of the night can change lives forever — which is exactly why the right to protect one’s property, home and family is so fiercely debated, and lucky constitutionally protected.

Late Night Prank Gone Wrong

First the low hanging fruit. Dave; it was a joke, please get over it. You are the only person in Newtown that thought I really wanted to build a stadium on 6 Commence Rd. Now on to Alex. You might not appreciate my writing style or my selection of words, but let's not loose sight of the fact that by responding to my letter in the manner that you did, you have removed any doubt whatsoever that you have no idea of the quantifiable benefits you are dismissing not only for the town, but also for protesters. Either you stopped listening at the word "ordinance" or you never started.. Your constitutional rights to assemble were never in question and would actually be strengthened and there would be literally no impediments. We could even title it "The Alex Villamil Ordinance" if you want. It could be your legacy and actually show Newtown your willingness to work in a bipartisan way for the betterment of the town. Businesses would be protected. Traffic wouldn't be interrupted. The town would save hundreds of thousands of dollars in police overtime. And maybe most importantly, the town could prevent another tragedy while mitigating legal risk in the event something terrible happens at a protest. Nothing bad could never happen in Newtown right? All that could be accomplished by a simple, non-intrusive ordinance unless all the detriments to our town are intentional in order to bring more attention to your cause. Alex, this was not me throwing a temper tantrum. Believe me, you will know it if that happens. I am just putting Newtown first. From that perspective, if you think critically, the regulation is necessary. It makes sense logically, rationally, and is reasonable. There is absolutely no down side. None. I would be willing to sit down with you to see if we could come to some type of compromise if you want. Let me know. You would be amazed how much you can accomplish when there is dialogue amongst neighbors.

It’s About Dialogue Amongst Neighbors — Not Regulation

A popular prank circulating on TikTok is “ding-dong-ditch” where a group of young people violently bang or kick someone’s door late at night and then “ditch” or run. On May 3 three high schoolers here in Fredericksburg Va. were participating in such a prank. One homeowner assumed, as in this case, an attempted break in and also took measures to defend his family and property. As the youths were running away he fired, striking an 18 year old graduating senior in the back killing him and seriously injuring a second youth. A wasted life, a family shattered, and the homeowner charged with murder.

You’re absolutely right — no one should ever feel unsafe in their own home. Being startled awake by violent banging at your door late at night is no joke, and it’s a stark reminder that danger can come without warning. That’s why I’m thankful for the right to protect ourselves, our families, and our property. In a moment like that, you don’t get a second chance to call for help before you act — you have to be prepared. Our homes should be a place of peace, not fear, and the ability to defend them is a right worth safeguarding.

<< Aug 2025 >>
S	M	T	W	T	F	S
27	28	29	30	31	1	2
3	4	5	6	7	8	9
10	11	12	13	14	15	16
17	18	19	20	21	22	23
24	25	26	27	28	29	30
31	1	2	3	4	5	6

Log In

Celebrate 60 Years Of ScrabbleÂ® With A Birthday Tournament

Leave a Reply Cancel reply