Date: Fri 27-Dec-1996
Date: Fri 27-Dec-1996
Publication: Bee
Author: ANDYG
Quick Words:
Autumn-Ridge-Butterfield-P&Z
Full Text:
Subdivision Off Butterfield Rd Fails To Get P&Z Approval
B Y A NDREW G OROSKO
The revised Autumn Ridge residential subdivision proposal for land west of
Butterfield Road has gained Planning and Zoning Commission (P&Z) approval in a
3-to-1 vote.
On December 19, P&Z members approved creating nine building lots on 42 acres
as requested by applicant David Kaufman, and others. The initial application
sought 10 building lots.
In making the approval, P&Z members placed several conditions on the
development, the major one being that the proposed Lot 2 and Lot 3 be combined
into one building lot.
P&Z member Daniel Fogliano asked whether having the two lots combined into one
lot would prevent the lot's owner from eventually seeking to resubdivide it
into two lots.
Member Heidi Winslow responded that if the lot's owner should seek to
resubdivide it in the future, that resubdivision application would be separate
and discrete from the nine-lot subdivision project.
The P&Z's decision on a nine-lot subdivision instead of a 10-lot subdivision,
in effect, defers action on the merits of having 10 lots on the site, she
said. Acting on nine lots instead of 10 lots finesses the 10-lot issue, she
added.
In voting on the nine-lot proposal, Mr Fogliano opposed it and members Ms
Winslow, Thomas Paisley and Chairman John DeFilippe favored it.
After the vote, Mr Fogliano said that open space issues which had been raised
about the development hadn't been addressed by the developer. Also, the wisdom
of creating an intersection with a 60-degree angle where the planned Autumn
Ridge Road will meet Butterfield Road wasn't addressed, he said.
In conditions placed on the nine-lot approval, P&Z members are requiring that:
a proposed stormwater detention basin be moved farther away from the planned
1,200-foot-long Autumn Ridge Road; wider road shoulders be constructed where
possible; underdrain structures be installed; a footing drain's water flow not
be directed toward an adjacent building lot; the path of a planned driveway be
reconfigured for safety reasons even if it requires moving a utility pole; and
a road construction bond of $165,000 be posted by the developer.
Autumn Ridge drew an unusual 2-to-2 tie vote from P&Z members in November,
requiring that the tie be broken.
Mr DeFilippe listened to audiotapes of a past public hearing on Autumn Ridge
to make him eligible to vote on the proposal.
When the development project came to a vote in November, Ms Winslow and P&Z
member Thomas Paisley voted in favor. However, recently-appointed P&Z members
James Boylan and Daniel Fogliano voted against the project, resulting in the
tie vote. Mr Boylan didn't attend the December 19 meeting.
In November, Mr Boylan had expressed concern over the presence of a natural
gas transmission pipeline at the development site.
Mr Fogliano then said the proposal was "not prudent," adding that the wetland
area proposed as the subdivision's open space isn't usable land.
Four-bedroom houses ranging in size from 2,500 to 3,000 square feet are
planned for the site.
