headline
Full Text:
Fairfield Hills Advisory Board Hears Early Impacts Of Proposed Developments
(with photo)
BY JEFF WHITE
Members of the Fairfield Hills Advisory Board (FHAB) met Thursday night, July
22, to hear representatives from Harrall-Michalowski Associates (HMA)
summarize the direct fiscal impacts of the three proposals for developing
Fairfield Hills made public two weeks ago.
The Hamden firm was hired by the town of Newtown to perform economic and
environmental impact studies to assist the town in determining whether it
should purchase the 186-acre core campus.
"We have waited for the proposals to be submitted because we think it will be
far more cost effective for the town to examine the proposals together, and
then consider the fourth alternative, which would be the option of the town
purchasing the property," said HMA official Richard Harrall.
Mr Harrall and Roy O'Neil, another representative, were able to cull some
preliminary fiscal impact numbers from their initial reading of the three
proposals, which they presented to the board in the form of handouts.
The early study performed by HMA looked into the direct benefits and costs for
Newtown. Among the town benefits highlighted were the Town of Newtown real
estate taxes, which listed each developer's estimate of the annual amount of
real estate taxes that the project will pay to Newtown upon completion. Each
developer based these approximations on the likely assessed value of the
proposed construction.
SBC Associates of Greenwich estimated a net incremental payment of $3.5
million to the town, while Becker & Becker Associates of New Canaan estimated
a payment of $2.3 million, and Wilder-Balter Partners of Elmsford, New York,
estimated a payment of $1.5 million.
Mr Harrall and Mr O'Neil also listed some incremental costs of the proposals
for Newtown, including residential educational costs, general administration
costs and non-residential general administration costs. Becker & Becker's cost
to the town was estimated at $1.7 million; the costs for the proposals of both
SBC and Wilder-Balter were approximated lower, at $1.25 million and $403,843
respectively.
The HMA officials indicated that each proposal came out with a positive net
direct fiscal impact for Newtown. However, Mr Harrall and Mr O'Neil were
adamant about the early nature of the numbers they were presenting to the
FHAB.
"We are not going to take these presentations at face value," said Mr O'Neil.
"One of things that we'll do as part of our work is to use the numbers that
have been presented [by the developers] and try and set the comparison up so
that all of the costs and all of the revenues are included in all of the
alternatives."
Both officials recognized that the initial estimates supplied by each
developer were in a great deal of flux; the further each proposal is
evaluated, the more concrete the numbers will become.
Moreover, Mr Harrall and Mr O'Neil commented on the importance of analyzing
not only the direct but also the indirect fiscal impact for the town, such as
the loss of athletic playing fields and the relocation of town administration
offices.
Most FHAB members had not had the opportunity to fully read through the myriad
details of each proposal, but early reactions to the development scheme hinted
at concerns about the environmental impacts of the projects. HMA plans to do a
full study of such impacts as well.
FHAB chairperson Michael Floros moved to adjourn the meeting in favor of
another meeting in early August, by which time each member will have had the
opportunity to dive into the nuances of each proposal, allowing them to bring
specific concerns and insights to the table for discussion.
The board members plan to work so that when the time comes, they can give a
definitive recommendation concerning whether the town should purchase the
property, a decision that is scheduled to be made in the fall.
While the FHAB goes through the fine print, HMA will continue its studies on
the economic and environmental impacts of each proposal, so that they may
indicate if there is any value in the town purchasing the property.
"What we have here is just a first blush look at the proposals," said Mr
Harrall. "There are a lot of variations, and further review is going to be
conducted so that we can get a complete picture on what the impact of the
proposals are going to be for the town of Newtown."
