Date: Fri 13-Dec-1996
Date: Fri 13-Dec-1996
Publication: Bee
Author: ANDYG
Quick Words:
P&Z-Wedgewood-Taunton-Hill
Full Text:
P&Z Rejects Wedgewood Subdivision On Taunton Hill
B Y A NDREW G OROSKO
Planning and Zoning Commission (P&Z) members have rejected unanimously the
controversial Wedgewood residential subdivision proposed for land off Taunton
Hill Road.
On December 5, Chairman John DeFilippe and members Thomas Paisley and Heidi
Winslow turned down the project proposed by M&E Land Group. The Wedgewood
proposal involved 15 building lots on 27 acres. Only 14 houses would have been
built because one house already exists on the site.
Before the vote, P&Z members suggested to the developers that an independent
environmental expert be hired to analyze the potential effects of Wedgewood.
But the developers were not willing to go that route, instead preferring that
the P&Z make a decision on the development application December 5.
Attorney Robert Hall, representing M&E, told P&Z members there has been much
public discussion about Wedgewood during recent months, adding that it is
unclear if hiring an expert would prove helpful. Mr Hall then asked that P&Z
members to vote on the proposal.
Mr DeFilippe responded that unless the developers were willing to grant a time
extension for added P&Z review, the P&Z had to vote on the matter that night.
Mr DeFilippe again asked the developers to endorse an independent
environmental study of the project.
But Mr Hall responded there has been enough research into the development
proposal, noting that he appreciates that questions arise when a development
application is disputed.
Both the applicants and opponents of the project presented expert scientific
witnesses on Wedgewood in public sessions dating back to August.
Mr Paisley observed the site contains some steep slopes and wetlands that
contain much water.
Although the proposal conforms to town rules concerning minimum building lot
sizes, it is questionable if there should be so many building lots on the
property, he said.
Ms Winslow said the development as planned would cause drainage, sedimentation
and siltation problems on an adjacent property. She said that a hydrogeologist
hired by opponents of the project made some helpful environmental points at a
past session on Wedgewood.
"I feel that the intervenor... raised enough concerns that this is not the
best plan for the property," Ms Winslow said.
"There is a misuse of the land as far as the drainage (plans) on this
application," she said.
A main concern expressed by nearby residents at past P&Z sessions is that
creating Wedgewood would deplete their domestic well water supplies.
Robert Melvin, the hydrogeologist hired by Wedgwood opponents, has said that
water wells in Wedgewood should be drilled before houses are built there to
ensure that adequate water supplies are available. Pre-drilling such wells
also would provide flexibility in drilling a second well for a house, if it's
needed, according to Mr Melvin.
The developers refuted the points which were raised about water supplies.
Mr Melvin also has recommended that the building lots in the proposed
development be reconfigured due to the proximity of intermittent surface water
in the areas proposed for septic systems.
The Taunton Hill Road area proposed for Wedgewood has many wells with low
water yields, and many existing wells have had to be redrilled to provide
adequate water supplies, according to Mr Melvin.
At a past session, Attorney Helen McGonigle, representing the Taunton
Dodgingtown Area Association, asked that the developers reduce the number of
lots proposed for Wedgewood.
Taunton Hill Road residents living near the site have told P&Z members they
strongly oppose the development because it would jeopardize their well water
supplies, overcrowd the area, cause drainage problems, and create added
traffic hazards.
The site which was eyed for development is on the east side of Taunton Hill
Road, just west of Cannon Drive. Cannon Drive is a dead end street that
extends westward from Birch Hill Road toward Taunton Hill Road.