Date: Fri 14-Jul-1995
Date: Fri 14-Jul-1995
Publication: Bee
Author: CAROLK
Quick Words:
a14-Wasserman-health-comment
Full Text:
COMMENTARY
WASSERMAN
LEGISLATION ADDRESSES MANY HEALTH ISSUES
Much has been said and written about the accomplishments of the 1995 session
of the General Assembly. The five-month session, which adjourned June 7, was
indeed productive, enacting a state budget that controls spending and reduces
taxes and major initiatives addressing pressing problems such as welfare and
crime.
The General Assembly considers many, many bills during each regular session.
Because of the sheer volume, it can be easy to overlook some of the major
actions that have been taken during the session or to focus attention on only
one aspect of a bill that may address a number of important issues. Such has
been the case this year concerning Senate Bill 1164, which is the bill that
provides for the closing of Fairfield Hills Hospital in Newtown. This
legislation has been signed by the Governor and is known as Public Act 95-257.
As would be expected, the focus of attention on this bill by the residents and
legislators from our area was the closing of Fairfield Hills. However, this
legislation does far more than just lay out the plan for closing this
hospital, or, for that matter, the closing of Norwich Hospital and
consolidation of the services provided by these two facilities at Connecticut
Valley Hospital in Middletown.
Senate Bill 1164 is also the legislation that provides for the structural
reorganization of the state agencies responsible for public health matters and
for the treatment of mental health and substance abuse. The legislation
establishes a new Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services, moving
the responsibility for substance abuse programs from the Department of Public
Health and Addiction Services, which will now be known simply as the
Department of Public Health.
Taxpayers will realize significant savings by the passage of this legislation
through the closing of Fairfield Hills and Norwich hospitals as well as
through the other provisions. Government reorganization and the consolidation
of agencies can achieve savings by reducing overlapping bureaucracy and
administrative costs while improving the efficiency of the services and
programs they offer. In the case of this legislation, the new organizational
structure is more appropriate and as such will improve the focus and
effectiveness of the programs involved.
The new Department of Public Health, like the state health departments that
preceded it, is responsible for matters such as public health policy, data
collection, dissemination of information regarding communicable diseases and
other health matters and the coordination of public health efforts by state
agencies and local health districts or health departments. Its functions range
from oversight of what may be the foremost cancer/tumor registry in the United
States to the testing of water supplies and regulation of hospital charges and
the medical professions.
The Department of Mental Health, on the other hand, is a treatment agency. It
provides direct care to individuals and promotes preventive measures. The
focus of our addiction services also is on treatment and prevention. Common
sense dictates that these functions and their common approaches be placed
together rather than relegating either to a secondary position in another
agency with an entirely different and unrelated mission. The new structure
outlined in Senate Bill 1164 allows the state to achieve the savings possible
by consolidating the bureaucratic and administrative functions of mental
health and addiction services while sharpening our focus on the programs they
provide and the people they serve.
Another important aspect of Senate Bill 1164 are the changes it makes to the
state's Office of Health Care Access. This agency was established just last
year and essentially charged with taking the lead in the effort to assure
health coverage for all state residents. I strongly agreed with the need for
this agency and voted for the legislation establishing it despite my strong
opposition to the unnecessary and very costly bureaucracy that was envisioned
at the time. One year later I am pleased to report that my concerns have been
addressed in Senate Bill 1164. The Office of Health Care Access is retained
along with its very necessary functions yet with substantially less
bureaucracy and at a substantially lower cost than first planned.
As you can see, Senate Bill 1164 is a comprehensive piece of legislation that
deals with many important and distinct issues. I hope this overview of the
legislation is helpful. If you have any questions about this legislation or
would like more information, please feel free to contact me. Write to me at
Room 4200, Legislative Office Building, Hartford, CT 06106-1591 or call my
office toll-free at 1-800-842-1423. TDD users call 240-0161.