TUV Rheinland- P&Z Reviews Testing Firm's Construction Application

By ANDY GOROSKO

Published: Jul 27, 2007 12:00 am

TUV Rheinlandâ

P&Z Reviews Testing Firmâs Construction Application

By Andrew Gorosko

Planning and Zoning Commission (P&Z) members are reviewing an industrial firmâs application to construct specialized facilities for its work in testing the safety and quality of electronic devices.

Engineer Ed Scoville, of the Stuart Somers Company, representing TUV Rheinland of North America, Inc, said TUV plans to acquire land adjacent to its 12 Commerce Road North American headquarters to build a new testing facility.

TUV is seeking to buy approximately six-tenths of an acre of adjacent town-owned land for the project. A town meeting on the proposed land sale is scheduled for August 6. The Board of Selectmen has recommended that the town sell the land to the company.

At a July 19 Planning and Zoning Commission (P&Z) meeting, Mr Scoville said TUV wants to build an approximately 2,100-square-foot structure within which it would test various electronic devices.

TUV is an independent testing firm that checks the safety and quality of new and existing products.

The area near the new testing building would be cleared of objects to ensure that test equipment is not affected by interference, Mr Scoville said. The new structure would not be visible from Commerce Road, he said.

The structure would be built of a nonmetallic material to avoid any test interference. The proposed new testing facility would replace an existing testing structure on the site, he said. The new test structure would be built to allow TUV to keep pace with changing testing standards.

P&Z Chairman Lilla Dean said the Inland Wetlands Commission (IWC) must review an aquifer protection study that was produced for TUV because the site is within the townâs Aquifer Protection District (APD). Such studies describe the steps that would be taken at the site to avoid aquifer contamination.

After reviewing the aquifer protection study, the IWC makes a recommendation to the P&Z, which then acts on the matter.

P&Z members are expected to act on TUVâs application for new construction at an upcoming session.

TUV evaluates, tests, and certifies that electrical and electronic components, computers, appliances, power tools, and other items, meet US and European standards. The firmâs world headquarters is in Cologne, Germany.

For example, the firm would test the electromagnetic emissions from a laptop computer to ensure that the computer would not interfere with the aviation electronics equipment that is in use on an aircraft in flight.

The Way We Were

Holiday Closings, Delivery Schedule: Independence Day

Toddy Hill Road Farmers Grateful For Help, 'Processing' After Fire Destroys Barn

Top Of The Mountain

Textile Artist Liz Alpert Fay Honors ‘Ordinary/Extraordinary Women’ With Large-Scale Hooked Portraits

The Editor suggest a meeting between the "Rock This Democracy " and the Police Commission. As a former Police Commissioner the Chief should have followed the chain of command and discussed this with the Police Commission. The Chief reports to the Elected Police Commission not our Republican First Selection. Can't help but feel this is Republican politics again making an issue out of a non issue.

Assembly Ordinance?

I support Chief Kullgren’s request to explore permitting, and cost-sharing for large gatherings. The right to protest is a cornerstone of our democracy, and I fully support the constitutional right to free speech and assembly. However, where and how often these protests occur matters. Main Street is not just a symbol — it’s a vital artery for daily life in town. When events are held there monthly, and at increasing scale, they cause disruption to residents, businesses, and traffic. While the Rock This Democracy group may describe these protests as unique or urgent, the frequency — roughly once every two weeks this spring — suggests more of a recurring series than a singular, spontaneous moment of civic expression. This isn’t about silencing anyone. It’s about fairness, public safety, and fiscal responsibility. Every time a protest happens, our police department is forced to assign resources, often on overtime. That expense adds up quickly. If any group wants to use public space regularly, particularly in a way that impacts traffic and requires police presence, then it’s reasonable for the town to consider permitting and cost-sharing — just as we do for other organized events like races, festivals, or parades. Let’s protect everyone’s rights — including the right of the community to function smoothly and the right of taxpayers not to bear undue cost for repeated events. I trust the Council to consider a reasonable path forward that balances speech with responsibility.

David, your passion for transparency would carry more weight if it weren’t routinely wielded like a cudgel. Let's set the record straight: no one is against easier access to documents or better online availability—we all want an informed public. But there's a difference between constructive advocacy and the kind of grandstanding that costs this town time, morale, and taxpayer money. You cite Ridgefield’s practices—great. Let's talk about that like adults. But instead, what we see is a steady stream of accusatory posts, legal challenges, and FOIA blitzes aimed less at solving problems and more at creating headlines. It’s not “slander” to point out that your approach often does more to divide and exhaust than to help. I’ve been at the very meetings you claim are inaccessible or opaque. I’ve seen your group turn logistical hiccups into conspiracy theories. I’ve watched as staff—who already work overtime—are dragged into another fishing expedition while real civic needs are left hanging. You’re not just pushing for access; you’re using the tools of open government to grind its gears to a halt. That’s not progress. That’s obstruction dressed up as advocacy. And the people paying for it—literally—are your neighbors. Let’s stop pretending it’s just about uploading PDFs. The issue here is how we engage. We can have real conversations about modernization without constant accusations, FOIA skirmishes, and Facebook pile-ons. Until then, I’ll continue to call out tactics that undermine, not uplift, our town.

Calls For Policies To Create Greater Transparency

The bottom line is this: costs are up, and no group—including teachers—is exempt. Ignoring Anthem’s recommended 22% increase last year may have directly caused the $2 million shortfall. Everyone has to share in the fix. That might mean higher premiums and leaner benefits. Complaints alone won’t solve the problem—realistic solutions will. I urge all Newtown Teachers to email their Union leaders and express their support for higher premiums.

Discusses Town Self-Funded Insurance Plan

Its really easy to make assertions and cast doubts from behind a keyboard....a little too easy aparently. You might try conducting the actual research BEFORE doing it next time. If you do, you too will find that there's no need to imagine such a policy to improve public transparency and participation. Take a look at Ridgefield's P&Z meeting agendas on their website for starters. They are just one town that provide links to electronic copies of applications and other public documents, so that their commissioners and residents can easily access them and be well-informed, before meetings and public hearings occur and without making them drive to town hall (during business hours) to ask their land use staff to pull the files and make copies of them, saving everyone time (time is money), and gasoline, and missed work. Most applicants alrleady submit electronic copies, and for those who don't, it's a lot easier for a staffer to scan them once, than to have to make copies every time someone asks for them. And please don't misrepresent or slander those who advocate for smart, low impact & sustainable development policies and practices as 'anti-development'.

<< Jun 2025 >>
S	M	T	W	T	F	S
1	2	3	4	5	6	7
8	9	10	11	12	13	14
15	16	17	18	19	20	21
22	23	24	25	26	27	28
29	30	1	2	3	4	5

Log In

TUV Rheinland- P&Z Reviews Testing Firm's Construction Application

Leave a Reply Cancel reply