Letters

Discusses Budget Reductions

Published: May 14, 2026 3:39 pm

To The Editor:

The so-called “cuts” approved by the Legislative Council this week were not substantive “cuts” at all — just small reductions to the $5,800,000 in increases to the previous budget referendum which failed.

As a member of the Legislative Council, I would like to provide additional context regarding the Council’s recent budget votes. The reductions approved — $471,000 from the town municipal budget and $400,000 from the school budget were not actual cuts, but rather reductions to proposed spending increases. Even after those adjustments, the combined town budget of $146,543,954 would still increase overall spending by $4,900,000, a 3.48% increase over last year, resulting in a 1.96% tax increase.

There has also been discussion about Republican votes on the school budget. The issue was not whether to reduce spending, but whether the proposed reductions were sufficient to address voters’ concerns. We voted against the motions because reducing the $96,000,000 school budget by $700,000, then $550,000, and then the approved $400,000, did not go far enough to ease the burden on taxpayers. With enrollment declining from 4,554 students ten years ago to 3,967 today, the school budget increases should be limited to the $3,088,436 needed for contracted personnel, operating expenses, and other mandatory contractual and statutory costs. We all want the best education for our students, and strong schools are vital to our town, but responsible government requires balancing educational priorities with the financial reality that spending increases must remain modest.

The referendum outcome demonstrated that town residents believe the current trajectory of spending and taxation is not sustainable. The revised budget still adds close to $5,000,000 in additional spending. I believe the Legislative Council should have returned with a budget that better reflects the message voters delivered and provides more substantial relief for taxpayers. Families, seniors, and long-time homeowners are feeling the strain of rising taxes and increasing costs. Voters asked for meaningful restraint, and the revised school budget still falls short.

My comments are my own and not of the Legislative Council of which I am an elected member.

Steve Stolfi

Newtown

None

Vote To Support The Town And School Budgets

Questions For Commission </p><p>On Aging

Follow The Minutes, Not Workarounds

We Can Support Our Children And Our Taxpayers

Well that is some spin. The Democrats have a super majority on the LC and passed the Education Budget without serious consideration of if the voters could afford the multi million dollar increase. "Was the request justified?" rather than "is this needed?" and "can the voters shoulder yet another large increase?" The voters rightly sent it back. Then for some reason all the discussion around reductions to the increase seemed to be coming from the classroom, rather than administration and overhead costs. Is this a coercive tactic to manipulate parents into supporting the budget like tacit threat of cutting freshman sports was two years ago? Who believes the Democrats did not caucus privately before the meeting and came in with a number already worked out? This is the Dems budget, they own it.

Education Cuts: Who Voted For What

I think it is important that we do not villainize every black box seen around a home, business, farm, or municipal property. A black exterior station does not always mean rat poison is being used. These stations can hold a number of different products, including monitoring blocks, snap traps, non-toxic bait, anti-tick bait stations, organic salt- or cornmeal-based control products, and newer fertility-control approaches intended to reduce rodent populations without traditional poisons. The better conversation, in my opinion, is not simply “black boxes are bad,” but rather: what is inside them, who is maintaining them, and whether the rodent issue is being managed responsibly. Exclusion, sanitation, trapping, habitat reduction, and careful monitoring should all be part of a responsible IPM strategy. To be fair, on my own property I do use rodenticides, including Bromethalin and Bromadiolone, in secured bait stations. But that is a choice I make for my property, based on my circumstances and the risk I am trying to manage. I also believe property owners should understand the tradeoffs and be encouraged to use the least harmful effective method whenever possible. I support protecting Newtown’s wildlife. I also support giving residents accurate information and not assuming that every black box represents reckless or unsafe pest control. The goal should be responsible rodent management, not fear of the box itself.

Discusses Policy Against Rodenticides

Debora, thank you! I accidentally doubled the project prices by adding the bond to the appropriation. Thank you so much for catching that and pointing it out. With the corrected numbers, the voters approved a combined $1.32 million for a salt shed ($600k) and library pavement ($720k), while rejecting the $1.12 million replacement turf. Regarding the 80s, I truly respect the hurdle of 14% mortgage rates. My point is simply that the math has shifted: in 1980, while the rates were higher, the price of a home relative to earnings was significantly lower. We are facing a different, but equally crushing, financial wall. Ultimately, it is disheartening that voters who recognized safe sidewalks and parking lots as essential, dismissed a playing field in the exact same condition. The turf has passed its life cycle and is just as much of a liability as the library’s pavement, the only difference is that this safety concern affects thousands of children who, coincidentally, cannot vote. These are apples-to-apples needs. I was hopeful our community would agree that all Newtown residents deserve safe conditions, regardless of which facility they utilize. Again, I would be remiss not to mention that when 82% of residents don’t show up, we have to deal with the interests of those who did. Hopefully, the next referendum will have a bigger turnout.

The ‘Me’ Generation

Thanks for the reply. I meant the numbers you presented in your letter. I found one place where other numbers were listed: https://www.newtownbee.com/04232026/get-out-and-vote-on-the-2026-27-proposed-municipal-and-school-budgets/?q=\\\%22advisory%20questions\\\%22. In that article, the numbers were cited as: Treadwell field: $1,125,000 Library: $720,000 Salt Storage: $600,000 As one who started out in the early 80's when inflation was double digits, my 1985 mortgage rate was 14%, and child care costs were comparable (in present value), I shared your grief but never considered the voters ironic or shameful. PS. I agree college tuition is ridiculous. Thankfully, universities are offering (or considering) waiving all or most tuition for middle class families (upwards of $200,000 incomes). Hopefully, they'll also reconsider their need for those funds in the first place.

Sure! Child care costs: https://www.ffyf.org/2022/10/13/data-child-care-prices-continue-to-rise-ahead-of-midterm-elections-outpacing-inflation/ (also from 2021-2025 we had 2 children in a local daycare in Newtown and it cost us $3200 a month, so that's a number I am very familiar with) Home price / median price vs income source: https://www.jchs.harvard.edu/home-price-income-ratios Tuition increase vs inflation: https://feed.georgetown.edu/access-affordability/noting-a-decline-in-middle-class-students-colleges-provide-more-aid/ Hope this helps :)

Log In

Discusses Budget Reductions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply