News

Arrest Follows Unusual Early Morning Crash On Poverty Hollow Road

Published: Dec 02, 2016 12:00 AM

Police report an unusual one-car accident on the section of Poverty Hollow Road lying between its intersections with Greenleaf Farms Road and Equestrian Ridge Road at about 2:30 am on November 27. Mot...

Sandy Hook Promise Debuts PSA Video To 'Know The Signs'

Published: Dec 02, 2016 12:00 AM

In a press release dated December 2, Sandy Hook Promise announced, "Almost four years after the tragedy that struck Sandy Hook Elementary School, there continues to be no reduction in the number of gu...

Fourth Annual Vigil For Gun Violence Victims

Published: Dec 02, 2016 12:00 AM

WASHINGTON, D.C. - The Newtown Foundation, together with St Mark's Episcopal Church, Faiths United to Prevent Gun Violence, States United to Prevent Gun Violence, Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violenc...

Firearms Advocacy Groups Respond To Sandy Hook School Gun Lawsuit Appeal

By Andrew Gorosko

Published: Dec 02, 2016 12:00 AM

Two firearms advocacy groups recently offered responses to a legal action, through which the families of nine Sandy Hook School shooting victims and one survivorÃÂ appealed to, and had their app...

Woman Arrested On 38 Counts In Drug Case

Published: Dec 02, 2016 12:00 AM

Police report they charged a Milford woman on 38 criminal counts following their investigation into illicit drug activity that allegedly occurred in June and July at a local dentist's office. After re...

REACH Shows Interest In Relocating To Fairfield Hills

By Kendra Bobowick

Published: Dec 01, 2016 12:00 AM

"Our board is really excited" about the prospect of locating REACH Newtown headquarters to Fairfield Hills, potentially in a duplex similar to the building recently refurbished for Parent Connection, ...

Police Reports | November 22-30, 2016

Published: Dec 01, 2016 12:00 AM

Asleep At Wheel At about 8:23 am on November 22, motorist Monsour Michael, 65, of Danbury, who was driving a 2016 Jeep Cherokee SUV on westbound Interstate 84, east of Exit 11, fell asleep at the...

Fire Reports | November 22-30, 2016

Published: Dec 01, 2016 12:00 AM

The two-way radio dispatchers working at the Newtown Emergency Communications Center located in Town Hall South at 3 Main Street report the following fire calls and the responders: Wednesday, Nove...

State Supreme Court To Review Legal Appeal In Sandy Hook School Gun Lawsuit

By Andrew Gorosko

Published: Dec 01, 2016 12:00 AM

This story was updated on December 6 to include statement from Atty Msner-Hage, and comment from Nicole Hockley. HARTFORD - As was requested by the plaintiffs in the recently dismissed state Supe...

Library Hosts Community Forum On New Director Search

By Eliza Hallabeck

Published: Dec 01, 2016 12:00 AM

Members the C.H. Booth Library Board of Trustees Search Committee hosted a community forum on Wednesday, November 30, to hear input on the process of hiring a new library director.chboothlibrary.org ...

The Way We Were

Top Of The Mountain

My Brother’s Band Planning ‘Mixed Bag’ Set List For Summer Concert Series Gig

Theater Review: A Very Happy Homecoming For ‘All Shook Up’

Theater Review: ‘Camelot’ Given The Royal Treatment In Neighboring Brookfield

It’s important to clarify the tone and context of Derek Pisani’s remarks, particularly the satirical line about suing Newtown for "Gross Stupidity." This was clearly a tongue-in-cheek jab at the exhausting culture of legal threats that’s become a staple on the local Facebook Group forums. It was a reflection of frustration over endless regulatory hurdles and obstructionism, and the desire to avoid common sense solutions not an insult aimed at residents. Satire, is meant to provoke thought and highlight the absurdities. If we are unable to distinguish between satire and literal threats, perhaps the comment hit closer to the truth than we’d like to admit. Rather than focusing on Pisanis style, we should be discussing the substance of what he’s pointing out: that Newtown’s progress is being routinely blocked by a small but vocal contingent who seem intent on saying “no” at every turn. They are saying no to any development, no to common sense solutions to crowd control, etc. Newtown deserves leaders who are willing to call things as they see them, even if their language ruffles feathers. That doesn’t mean they lack respect for constituents—it means they care enough to challenge the Mob and push for solutions. Isn't that what we elect people to do? I applaud Pisani's dedication, he certainly has earned my vote. Regardless, let’s not reduce conversation to tone-policing and outrage. Let’s focus on the issues that matter.

Who is Calling Newtowners Stupid?

Thank you for pointing out the trail access provisions included in the BOS motion—it’s an important clarification that deserves more attention in this conversation. If the development is, in fact, required to provide permanent free public access and commit to ongoing maintenance of this section of the Rochambeau Trail, that is a remarkably beneficial outcome for the town. oIt’s not every day that a private project shoulders the long-term burden of preserving and caring for a public historical corridor at no taxpayer cost—especially one that previously had no formal access, upkeep, or visibility. Let’s be honest: the idea that the only way to protect history is by preventing any development nearby is a rigid and unworkable standard. What’s being proposed here appears to strike a rare balance—historic preservation, public access, and smart development all rolled into one. That’s not a loss its a win. So rather than allowing a handful of voices to derail progress under the banner of “historic purity,” maybe it’s time to acknowledge the reality: this trail is better off with structured stewardship and visibility than remaining an overgrown ghost on old maps. Let’s move forward. Bring in the easement, bring in the public access—and yes, bring in the bulldozers!!! Progress and preservation can coexist. Let’s not let the NIMBY use fear or nostalgia keep us stuck in the past.

Discusses Rochambeau Trail And 6 Commerce Road

I've heard that several people are under the impression that the public might be banned from the Rochambeau Trail. Points 2 and 3 from the BOS motion (included in full below) make it clear that public access to the trail is part of the requirements for the developer. From what I understand, it requires free public access to the trail in perpetuity. Technically, this could be argued to be a "payment-in-kind," that attempts to balance public good with overall town growth. We can argue about weather that balance is acceptable and how the trail may be affected, but with the understanding that the trail is expected to be maintained as a publicly accessible trail regardless. July 15, 2024 Board of Selectmen approved motion: Discontinuance of Reservoir Road: Selectman Cruson moved the resolution: Resolved, that the Newtown Board of Selectmen, in accordance with Section 2-115(d)(8) of the Town Charter and Conn. Gen. Stat. §13a-49, and subject to the conditions set forth below, hereby discontinues an unimproved portion of Reservoir Road described as “Portion of Reservoir Road to be Discontinued “on that certain survey map which will be recorded on the Newtown Land Records titled “Map Showing Portion of Reservoir Road to be Discontinued” dated August, 2023 and revised September 15, 2023, and certified substantially correct by Gregory Szyszowski of SLR (the “Survey Map”), said discontinuance contingent and effective only upon the completion of the following: 1. The approval of an application for the development of land in the manner described in a letter from Attorney Thomas W. Beecher to First Selectman A. Jeffrey Capeci and Members of the Board of Selectmen dated May 30, 2024, pursuant to the “Residential Open Space Development” regulations of the Borough of Newtown by the Borough of Newtown Zoning Commission, and construction of that approval project within the timeframes required for special exception approval; 2. The inclusion of the discontinued portion of the road as part of the final Declaration of Conservation Restriction; 3. The conveyance of a mutually agreeable public easement to the Town of Newtown for pedestrian, bicycling, equestrian, and all other passive recreational uses (to exclude the use of motorized vehicles except as may be necessary by the Town or its designee to effectuate the purpose of the easement), and for municipal utility purposes; Be it further resolved, that Castle Hill Real Estate Holdings, LLC., its successors and assigns, shall not use any portion of the discontinued road as a vehicular road or access way to and from any developed portions of the property. Be it further finally resolved, that should any of the foregoing contingencies not occur, then the discontinuance contemplated herein shall not become effective and this resolution will become null and void. From: https://www.newtown-ct.gov/sites/g/files/vyhlif12216/f/minutes/bos_7-15-24_min-_att_final.pdf

Discusses Rochambeau Trail And 6 Commerce Road

Is this paper road (roads that only exist on paper map but not in reality) even owned by the Town? Many roads that predate the Town's road standards are privately owned and were never accepted by the Town, such as many of the nonconforming roads around the lake communities where the property owners own right to the center line. That is something we had to deal with when working on the Roads Ordinance a few years back. We also had to deal with a private road to run the utilities to the new SHS.

Discusses Rochambeau Trail And 6 Commerce Road

For anyone who wants to know, I cant post a link here, but Housatonic Resources Recovery Authority has an entire website. Look up "HRRA whats in whats out"

Copyright ©2025 The Newtown Bee / All rights reserved