Date: Fri 06-Mar-1998
Date: Fri 06-Mar-1998
Publication: Bee
Author: CURT
Quick Words:
edink-sewer-assessments
Full Text:
Ed Ink: Paying For Sewers
Later this month, residents, businesses, and churches in Newtown's sewer
districts should get their first sewer bills. The assessments on 641
residential properties and 126 non-residential properties will generate
approximately $15.9 million -- about half of the overall $32.5 million cost of
the sewer system. (A listing of all the sewer assessments appears on pages
C9-10 this week.) Most of the rest of the sewer system costs is covered by
state and federal grants and local property tax revenues.
The town's Water Pollution Control Authority, which has overseen the
construction of the system and is charged with its administration, has come up
with a remarkably fair assessment formula, which charges the bulk of the sewer
users -- individual residences -- $9,900. Apparently that formula sits well
with most people. Informal appeals of individual assessments were filed by
only a little more than one percent of the property owners in the sewer
district, and about half of that number received reductions in their
assessments as a result.
The most controversial of the appeals came from the five churches in the sewer
district, which had faced assessments ranging from $34,380 for the tiny St
John's Episcopal Church in Sandy Hook to $227,430 for St Rose of Lima. The
churches argued that they should not be assessed at the standard
non-residential rate, like most business and commercial properties, because
they held a special status in town, providing social and spiritual benefits to
the community. They are tax exempt, they pointed out, and sewer assessments
are a kind of tax. They lobbied for the $9,900 resdential rate.
In the end, the WPCA, in Solomonic fashion, did reduce the assessments for the
churches, by more than half in some cases and by more than a fair measure in
all cases. Sewer assessments, after all, are not taxes, they are utility
charges. As far as we know, the churches aren't getting any breaks in their
electric and phone bills; they have no cause to expect to be absolved from
paying a rate commensurate with their use of this particular utility simply
because it is town-owned.
