Date: Fri 10-May-1996
Date: Fri 10-May-1996
Publication: Bee
Author: STEVEB
Quick Words:
schools-Hawley-project
Full Text:
Building Panel Wants Hawley Project To Be Re-Bid
B Y S TEVE B IGHAM
The Public Building and Site Commission wants to see the price on the Hawley
School addition lowered and has requested that the project be reopened for
bidding.
The commission, in an effort to keep the process flowing, recommended the
proposed project be passed on to the Legislative Council for funding request,
but only on the condition that funding not exceed $4.2 million. The board
hopes that number can be reduced even more.
Bidding on Hawley School pushed that project's costs up $409,000 over budget,
which was originally around $3.5 million.
"Hopefully by rebidding, we could come in at a lesser amount," explained
building chairman Frank Krasnickas. "That's our rationale."
Architect Rusty Malek of Kaestle Boos said value engineering and a $150,000
contingency cut would trim about $284,000 worth of costs from the project, but
the building commission said it would like to see new bids from companies in
the hopes that figures would drop even more.
The building commission also endorsed the $26.2 million high school project,
which came in $1.5 million below school estimates. The panel made its
decisions Tuesday night at a special joint meeting with the Board of
Education, which also endorsed both projects.
Superintendent John R. Reed pointed out that in order to re-bid, all previous
bidders must be rejected. Mr Krasnickas said he hoped the second bid process
would not delay the project
Charles Boos of Kaestle Boos said the concept of value engineering is better
handled in re-bid process. Boos said the procedure could be done quickly,
avoiding a major delay and said the possibility of the bids coming in higher
was not realistic. Only parts of the project would be re-bid, he said.
Paul Des Biens was the only building commission member not in favor of
re-bidding, pointing out that the town might end up being sorry for
concessions made in the school.
"Some of the niceties in the proposed plan would create a tremendous
difference in the public's view of the final product."
School board member Susan Hills agreed, voicing her concern over less quality.
There was some concern that parts of the NHS project would have had to be
reduced or eliminated after the Legislative Council cut $350,000 in debt
service for the bonding of the project, which would have equaled a $3.5
million cut in the plans. But the low bids prompted Mr Malek to suggest the
school board include all of the project's options, which feature such
amenities as a double-decker gymnasium, a new track, and renovated locker
rooms.
The construction management firm of O&G Construction of Torrington continues
its review of the bids for the high school to confirm the low bidders.
