Date: Fri 23-Jan-1998
Date: Fri 23-Jan-1998
Publication: Bee
Author: MICHEL
Quick Words:
school-budget
Full Text:
Board Reviews $3.1 Million School Spending Plan
BY MICHELE HOGAN
Superintendent of Schools John Reed has proposed a $32.9-million budget for
the 1998-98 fiscal year, a 10.45 percent increase from last year.
"Where is 3.1 million going to get us?" asked John Kortze, chairman of the
Legislative Council's finance committee, during the Board of Education's
January 20 budget meeting.
Dr Reed explained that the largest part of the budget increase, almost $2
million, is for salaries.
Equipment, mostly computers, will cost approximately $400,000 more; improved
instructional supplies, "off-years testing" (basic testing for students in
grade levels not tested by the Connecticut Mastery Test) and workbooks, etc.,
$143,000 more; electricity and fuel oil, $120,000 more.
Salaries
Of the $2-million increase in the budget due to salaries, just over $1 million
is for teachers. This is made up of $611,000 in teacher salary increases
required by the teacher's contract and another $441,000 budgeted for 12.6 new
teaching positions.
Increased special education teaching staff, totalling $232,000; support staff
(custodians, educational assistants, technology staff); and a provision for
salary adjustments for support staff whose contracts are currently under
negotiation make up most of the rest of the increases in the salary portion of
the budget.
This budget submission is based on an enrollment forecast of 4,422, which is a
3.8 percent increase over 1997-98.
New teachers will be needed at all three school levels, but most of 12.6 new
positions will be at the middle- and high-school level. Dr Reed wrote,
"Basically, most of the new positions are intended to maintain existing
class-size practices. The guidelines we attempt to follow are: 20 or less in
grades K-2 and 20-25 in grades 3-8. ... Many classes at the high school have
23-26 students."
Hawley Lead Teacher
The Board of Education discussed Dr Reed's budget item of $35,000 for a lead
teacher for Hawley School.
Currently, Sandy Hook School is the only elementary school in the district
with a lead teacher.
Dr Reed said that the Board of Education had made "a legal commitment five or
six years ago to provide assistants to principals. The principals have been
very professional. We need to continue to phase-in lead teachers, until we
have a lead teacher in every school, over the next few years."
Board of Education member Charles Nanavaty asked if it would be possible to
rotate a lead teacher among the schools.
Dr Reed responded that Sandy Hook School has a higher enrollment than the
other elementary schools and the highest projected enrollment growth. He said
that the lead teacher there is "very much needed."
Dr Reed expressed support for Linda Siciliano, principal of Hawley School, in
her request to be next in line for a lead teacher.
Dr Reed wrote in his budget that lead teachers are less expensive than
assistant principals. Their role is similar to that of assistant principals:
They provide the principals more time to problem-solve with teachers and
parents; to develop policy and school improvement plans; and for
administrative duties required in a large elementary school.
The increased knowledge and versatility gained by the lead teacher is also a
potential benefit to the school system in future years.
"We talked about lead teachers when the schools were at 400 [pupils]. Now,
they are 500 to 600, and we are still talking," said Amy Dent, school board
chairman.
At Peggy Ulrich-Nims' request, the board will collect and review data from
other comparable elementary schools regarding lead teachers.
Technology
New technology, primarily computers, are proposed for all school levels. A
language lab and 50 computer systems at the high school is budgeted at
$194,000. The middle school is slated $48,600 for new computers. This
equipment would allow teachers to use the new computer infrastructure that the
school recently set up through the use of a $110,000 state grant.
Requests for computers in elementary schools include $44,600 for 16 multimedia
machines at Hawley School. Each third- to fifth-grade classroom would get two,
and each K-2 classroom would get one with two additional portable computers
and peripherals.
Technology needs will be discussed in detail in upcoming meetings.
Spending & Taxes
This new budget proposal shows a 10.45 percent increase over the current
budget of $29.7 million.
Last year, the budget increased 5.19 percent over the year before.
In his summary statement, Dr Reed wrote that "to the casual observer, the 5.19
percent increase in the 1997-98 operating budget could be deemed very
significant, perhaps even excessive; however, according to a report by
consultant Joseph Schwartz, because enrollment over the same period increased
by 4.6 percent, the result was a nominal per-pupil spending increase of only
0.6 percent."
Dr Reed stated in his report that the "trends previously reported continue: 1)
Per pupil spending adjusted for inflation declined, this year; and 2)
Education spending as a percentage of total town spending declined, this year,
while enrollment grew for the eighth straight year."
Dr Reed also commented on a general trend toward decreased state aid to school
districts. Newtown has seen state aid reduced from 24 percent in 1990-91 to
13.3 percent in 1997-98. If the 1988 statutes had not been changed, then
Newtown would have received almost $6 million more in state funding for
education in the 1996-97 budget alone.
Dr Reed presented comparative data, showing that Newtown's per pupil spending
of $6,743 in the 1996-97 year placed Newtown at the bottom of the list for
per-pupil expenditures in three comparisons -- bottom of the 22 districts in
Fairfield County; bottom of the 18 districts in Educational Reference Group B;
and bottom of list of the nine school districts geographically contingent to
Newtown. (This is the most recent comparative per-pupil costs available.)
John Kortze commented that "as a taxpayer, I want to know how my taxes went
up, not so much per-pupil expenses."
Dr Reed said, "We don't have a magic number for per-pupil expenditure."
At the end of his presentation, Dr Reed said, "You have never heard me say
this before, but, if we don't do these things [major budget recommendations],
I expect there would be a negative impact on the kids."
During the meetings public participation, Pat Barrett, PTA president at Middle
Gate School, said, "I agree with Dr Reed. We are a well-oiled machine. ...
Nobody wants their taxes to go up, but we have to weigh what is important and
what isn't."
