Log In


Reset Password
Archive

Date: Fri 08-Nov-1996

Print

Tweet

Text Size


Date: Fri 08-Nov-1996

Publication: Bee

Author: CAROLK

Illustration: C

Location: A14

Quick Words:

Playing-Neeson-Quinn-Collins

Full Text:

(rev "Michael Collins" for Now Playing, 11/1/96)

Now Playing-

Interesting & Absorbing, `Collins' Still Leaves Quinn Without The Girl

By Trey Paul Alexander III

As I sat waiting for the lights to dim on a screening of Michael Collins , a

historical drama on the beginnings of the Irish Republican Army, thoughts of

JFK were dancing in my head: another volatile sociopolitical moment from the

20th Century gets a subjective, celluloid treatment. Will it inspire debates

on fact vs fiction? Perception vs reality? Yet, as the film progressed, I

found my mind wandering onto another, albeit less trenchant, topic: when will

Aidan Quinn ever come out on top?

Jest all you want, but I'm beginning to pity the poor man and the characters

he plays. Among those who have seen Legends of the Fall , I'm one of the few

who still can't understand why Alfred (Quinn) was treated like a pariah and

had to the humiliation of having beautiful Susannah (Julia Ormond) choose his

rebellious brother, Tristan (Brad Pitt), over him. The following year, in real

life, Quinn lost the coveted leading role in A Time to Kill to newcomer and

budding young star, Matthew McConaughey. Now, in Michael Collins , playing at

Danbury's Crown Cine theater, he plays Harry Boland, IRA leader Collins' best

friend and one-third of a love triangle between the bosom buddies and the

beguiling Kitty Kiernan (Julia Roberts). Can you guess who doesn't end up with

the girl?

Granted, this isn't exactly the weightiest of matters with which to grapple

when one is speaking of a film that chronicles such a controversial figure as

Irish revolutionary Michael Collins (Liam Neeson). Unfortunately, the film

lights too few fires (scenes of guerrilla warfare notwithstanding) of true

emotional resonance to get audiences - particularly American audiences,

already distant from the conflict in geography and social conscience - to

invest in this film and its characters with any real passion.

Fault, however, lies not with Neeson's work in the title role. As the

dedicated, imposing Collins, nicknamed Big Fella by his compatriots, Neeson

effectively conveys the man's drive, desire and the toll his devotion to the

cause of Ireland's freedom from British reign eventually caused. But the

motion picture, which begins with the unsuccessful Easter Uprising in 1916,

fails to provide an adequate access point for viewers to really engage with

this tale.

One wonders if director Neil Jordan ( The Crying Game , Interview With the

Vampire ), an Irishman himself, was so close to the tale, which conveys events

with repercussions still being felt today, that he rendered it in shorthand

and assumed all would follow. Did he therefore feel no obligation to handcuff

his film with massive, yet helpful exposition on the subject? Whatever the

reason, the end result is that Michael Collins is less than it could have

been.

I'm prompted to think of In the Name of the Father , which set its tone early

in the proceedings with a kinetic opening chase sequence through the streets

of Belfast. But more than just establishing a mood and setting, In the Name of

the Father gave audiences access into the minds and hearts of its characters,

and that is exactly what is lacking in Michael Collins .

Despite Neeson's formidable presence, Collins lacks the driving, ideological

force that has propelled such recent bio-pics as JFK or Malcolm X . And what

I'm talking about is more than just mere controversy, though that may be a

tangible, irrepressible offshoot. Rather, it is a tendency in the screenplay

to forge ahead, sometimes with stubborn one-mindedness, with a distinct

viewpoint that challenges the audience and dares them, regardless of whether

or not they agree with the account, not to be compelled by it. Ultimately,

Michael Collins , which is rated R for violence and profanity, is an

interesting film that nonetheless fails to become an absorbing one.

Comments
Comments are open. Be civil.
0 comments

Leave a Reply