Cultural Events

Next HRRA Household Hazardous Waste Drop-Off Event Scheduled In Newtown

Published: May 02, 2026 8:00 am

Housatonic Resource Recovery Authority (HRRA) has its next Household Hazardous Waste Drop-Off event planned for Saturday, May 9, 9 am to 2 pm, at Newtown Public Works, 4 Turkey Hill Road.

Residents of all towns in the HRRA region — Newtown, Bethel, Bridgewater, Brookfield, Danbury, Kent, New Fairfield, New Milford, Redding, Ridgefield, Roxbury, Sherman, Weston, and Wilton — are eligible to drop off permitted materials for disposal. The one-day event accepts items not allowed at local landfills and transfer stations.

The protocol for the event is as follows: Residents must always remain in their vehicle; items being dropped off are to be in the back of each vehicle prior to arrival (place before arriving at Public Works, not at the site); windows are to be rolled up; and drivers need to be ready to place their driver’s license against their window for proof of residency.

Workers will remove the contents and will be in full safety gear.

Smoking will not be allowed on site.

Fuel containers will not be poured out and returned.

Wait times may vary from five to 30 minutes depending on volume of traffic.

HRRA reserves the right to inspect vehicles with excessive amounts of material. Large quantities are subject to fees.

Items accepted will include one-pound single use propane cylinders; aerosol cans (full or partially full); carburetor cleaners, brake fluids; cleaners for ovens, toilet bowls, and drains; cleaners for rugs and upholstery; dry cleaning solvents; engine degreasers; flea powder; hobby supplies; lighter fluids; mercury thermostats and thermometers; moth balls; and paints, paint thinners, and strippers.

Also pesticides, herbicides, insecticides (including lawn care products); photo chemicals, chemistry; polishes for furniture, floor, and metal; resins, rosins, and adhesives; rubber cement, airplane glue; septic tank degreasers; spot removers; stains and varnishes; swimming pool chemicals; transmission fluids, car waxes; vapes; waste fuels (kerosene, gasoline); and wood preservatives.

The following items will not be accepted on May 9: 20-pound propane tanks, auto batteries and tires, fluorescent bulbs, motor oil and antifreeze, and rechargeable batteries. HRRA suggests residents contact their hometown recycling center to see if any of the above will be accepted there.

The following can be put into the garbage: alkaline batteries, empty aerosol cans, and smoke detectors.

HRRA says the local police department should be contacted concerning the following: ammunition, explosives, and fireworks.

The following are also not accepted at HRRA Household Hazardous Waste Drop-Off events: medical waste, PCB capacitors, pharmaceutic, controlled substances, pathological material, radioactive materials, and unknown gases. Contact HRRA for safe disposal options.

For additional information, including items that will not be accepted, visit hrra.org/household-hazardous-waste or contact HRRA, 203-775-4539 or info@hrra.org, for details or guidance.

For those who miss the Newtown collection event, the next HRRA Household Hazardous Waste Drop-Off is scheduled for Saturday, June 6, 9 am to 2 pm, at Bethel High School.

Housatonic Resource Recovery Authority has its next Household Hazardous Waste Drop-Off event planned at Newtown Public Works.

Genealogy Club's Next Program To Dig Into 'Dissecting A Civil War Pension Record'

Choral Society Planning ‘Voices Of America’ Performance

Newtown Earth Day Festival Was A Success

Local Fourth Grader To Host ‘Gaming For Change’ On May 16

The editorial took no position on the budget going up or down so you're reading things into the editorial that simply aren't there. The turnout is tied to the lack of passage, in that people who came out to vote last time did not this time, indicating a lack of support on their part. Perhaps it wasn't spelled out clearly enough, but that's what the editorial was driving at, people showing lack of support by not casting a vote. The editorial did address likely concerns among voters that may have led to lack of support and lack of turnout. This lower turnout also follows increasing turnout over the past four referendums in three years (meaning it is an aberration from that), and increased turnout is something that I do push for regularly in editorials. Any disappointment you might be seeing is at the break in that trend, not at whether the budget passed or not. I'd rather see more people come out and vote "no" then not vote at all.

Lower Turnout Results In Two Budget Defeats

Clearly, property owners no longer want to bear the burden of expenses while the state does not meet it’s responsibilities. Rising costs must be addressed by actions that do not include yearly increases of property owners’ taxes. The state of CT must meet its share of the educational costs, and other costs.

Town And School Budgets Fail At Referendum

This feels like an oddly misleading headline and narrative, particularly coming from the Editorial Board. The headline "Lower Turnout Results in Two Budget Defeats" pushes a misleading narrative regarding voter turnout, and then seeks to tie the outcome of the referendum to that misleading narrative. Sure, voter turn out for this year's referendum, 18%, was lower than last year's. However, last year's turnout, 25.4%, represented the highest turnout in the most recent 10 budget referendums. If you take the time to examine turnout percentages between 2017 and 2026 (2017: 19.9, 2018: 15.7, 2019: 17, 2020: 0, 2021: 8.98, 2022: 7.7, 2023: 8.8, 2024: 15.1/17.49, 2025: 25.4, 2026: 18), this year's turnout was actually the third highest in the past 10 cycles. Perhaps the headline of this article should say "Lower Voter Turnout Than Last Year", which is more accurate, rather than creating an impression that this year's turnout is some type of aberration - a narrative that the turnout numbers, in all their binary glory, simply do not support. Further, the headline of this article appears to tie the "lower turnout" to the defeated budgets. Sure, that could be true. But, perhaps, its more likely that Newtown residents are feeling the squeeze of multiple economic influences. In Newtown, we've experienced property revaluations and increased municipal spending. Eversource continues to raise rates. The state legislature gives PURA the authority to impose Public Benefit charges that benefit a tiny percentage of the public (and subsequently burdening the rest of us). At the national level, inflation has run rampant for years and many of those costs remain high to this day. In short, the data tells a far less dramatic—and far more honest—story than the headline suggests. This wasn’t an electorate vanishing in apathy; it was a fairly typical turnout delivering an verdict that, perhaps, some at the Editorial Board didn't like. At some point, it’s worth considering that residents aren’t confused, disengaged, or misled by turnout; they’re simply doing math at their kitchen tables and concluding that “no” is the only responsible answer left.

Enjoyed the forum which only confirmed my support for Brandon Moore as the Democratic candidate to run for the state representative position. Brandon Moore did not waiver about his duty to all the people, if elected, when an issue presents itself that requires that he voice a difference of opinion for the wellbeing of Newtown residents. If Michelle Ku’s 16 years have led to her loyalty being to other elected officials, as she implied, then Newtown is going to continue to witness actions that do not protect its residents. She could not unseat republican, Mitch Bolinsky, during a Blue Wave, and once again, will not do it now. Winning that seat is critical for all. That explains why her previous campaign committee now campaigns for Brandon Moore. It explains all the endorsements he has received from local elected democratic officials. It’s why we need Brandon Moore to be the democratic candidate to run for state representative.

Second Newtown DTC, League Of Women Voters Candidates Event Planned

Appreciated the opportunity to hear from both candidates as we were present for the College Dems forum but only heard from Brandon Moore. It was an opportunity to see who can unseat the Republican incumbent and there is no doubt that Brandon Moore should be the Democratic candidate. One concerned parent posed a question about discrimination unaddressed by the school district and interestingly enough, Michelle Ku, who proudly speaks of her Board membership years, said little, while Brandon Moore passionately addressed the issue along with his experience as an Apache Helicopter Commander. This family is supporting Brandon Moore. We need change and someone who is not afraid to disagree, especially about the rising costs of living in Newtown.

Log In

Next HRRA Household Hazardous Waste Drop-Off Event Scheduled In Newtown

Leave a Reply Cancel reply