Political Pep Or Pedagogy?
Political Pep Or Pedagogy?
To the Editor:
I have just read the letter in last weekâs Bee [Letter Hive, 12/18/09, âWhy Are There Political Pep Rallies At The Middle School?â, Scott Reiss] that expressed concern about a political rally at Newtown Middle School, where a representative from an environmental company gave a presentation about climate change and then urged students to sign a petition. I was not there (and nor was he), but I would like to respond generally to the issues that this writer described.
The writer was concerned that an opposing view was not presented. I am not sure what such a view would be. I would be surprised if the presenter did not explain what would happen if our society continued to expel carbon into Earthâs atmosphere at the current rate. If anyone is seeking a message that carbon emissions arenât harmful, I donât think they could find one that is supported by science. There may be ways to achieve reductions in carbon emissions that were not presented in the NMS assembly, and hopefully the teachers will fill in these information gaps.
The writer also pointed out that the presenting company would benefit financially from government contracts as a result of this lobbying. Iâm sure it is hoping to, but we live in a capitalist society where everything is driven by a profit motive. Fortunately, this seems to have been a presentation where the profit-driven message would actually be beneficial to our world. The important thing is that this crucial information was presented to our students in a compelling way.
I also disagreed with this writerâs comment that the assembly took away from instructional time. It sounds like a great opportunity to provide information in a different way and in a different setting than the classroom. This should be celebrated, not criticized.
Lisa Romano
28 The Boulevard, Newtown                            December 23, 2009
