Date: Fri 13-Feb-1998
Date: Fri 13-Feb-1998
Publication: Bee
Author: CURT
Quick Words:
edink-home-rule-towers
Full Text:
Ed Ink: Towers And Home Rule
Home rule is the principle that gives communities the power to control those
things they hold near and dear - like the neighborhood school and the view
from the top of the hill. And because all politics is local, home rule has
been woven into many of our state laws and policies at the insistence of state
legislators, who can be, at times, the most local of all politicians.
Underlying the principle of home rule is the notion that there is a kind of
wisdom that is place-specific. No one knows our town like we do. There are
times when that notion is tested, and now is one of those times.
Two committees of the state General Assembly are considering legislation that
will give towns the option of drafting their own regulations governing the
placement of telecommunication towers within their borders. The measure has
generated strong opposition from the telecommunications industry, which wants
to leave jurisdiction for the placement of these towers solely with the
Connecticut Siting Council. The council, according to the industry, has the
expertise to establish a network using the fewest number of towers in the most
efficient way.
There is much to be said for expertise and efficiency, especially in the
design and implementation of new technologies. But when age-old rural vistas
and ridgetops are suddenly spiked with towers and their beacons, people don't
want to hear about efficiency, and it doesn't take an expert to understand
that people aren't going to willingly surrender their traditional rights to
shape the look and character of their town to the exigencies of a utility
company's capital-expansion plans.
Under federal law, telecommunications companies cannot be blocked from placing
towers in the countryside, but local concerns and preferences should be on the
agenda when placement decisions are made. The issue has been and will continue
to be contentious. Any town taking on a telecommunications company over tower
placement can expect to spend a lot of money on legal fees, but the state
should at least give communities that option.
