Date: Mon 06-May-1996

By Previous Employees

Published: Aug 11, 1999 12:00 am

Author: TOMW

Illustration: I

Full Text:

Six Men Out

In the fallout of the Cooperstown baseball trip mishap, six members of the

Newtown High baseball team have been suspended from the team for their

involvement in the consumption of alcohol.

Team co-captain Chris Hayward, Todd Badillo, Josh Catigano, Anthony Cross,

Greg Darling, and Mitch Houser were each suspended from the team for 21 days

(until May 10). During that suspension they will not be allowed to participate

in or attend any social activities sponsored by the school.

At the conclusion of that suspension - which is reportedly the standard school

policy - only Houser, who was implicated to a lesser degree, will be allowed

to rejoin the team.

" I feel sorry for these guys, but unfortunately they brought this upon

themselves, " said NHS co-coach Al Borchetta. " They're all nice kids, but

they screwed up. They're young adults. They knew the rules and chose not to

follow them. And the punishment fits the crime. "

Said coach Dan Winsett, " We just want to put this whole thing behind us now

and move on. "

While Hayward and Houser are both seniors, the other four suspended players

are juniors and will be allowed to come back out for the team next season

according to the coaches.

" I've been depressed this whole week, " said NHS captain, Matt Zavatsky. " I

just kept thinking about what kind of a season this could have been. But we

have to work with what we've got now. We have a bunch of guys here who want to

play ball and that's what we're going to do. We may not win as many games but

we'll play our hearts out. We're trying to pick up our heads and play

baseball. It was a brutal loss for us and we just have to put it behind us

now. "

To replenish the varsity roster, coaches Borchetta and Winsett have pulled

several players up from the jayvee team where they will shuttle back and forth

throughout the remainder of the season.

" This program is deep in talent, " Borchetta concluded. " We knew that our

youth was going to be a bright spot, and now its just going to get brighter,

sooner. The guys can perform. We have a lot of tremendous sophomores who are

really going to help us. "

Nighthawk Track And Field Teams Host Meet

New Heights Vacation Bible School Returning

Next HRRA Household Hazardous Waste Drop-Off Event Scheduled In Newtown

Genealogy Club's Next Program To Dig Into 'Dissecting A Civil War Pension Record'

Choral Society Planning ‘Voices Of America’ Performance

The editorial took no position on the budget going up or down so you're reading things into the editorial that simply aren't there. The turnout is tied to the lack of passage, in that people who came out to vote last time did not this time, indicating a lack of support on their part. Perhaps it wasn't spelled out clearly enough, but that's what the editorial was driving at, people showing lack of support by not casting a vote. The editorial did address likely concerns among voters that may have led to lack of support and lack of turnout. This lower turnout also follows increasing turnout over the past four referendums in three years (meaning it is an aberration from that), and increased turnout is something that I do push for regularly in editorials. Any disappointment you might be seeing is at the break in that trend, not at whether the budget passed or not. I'd rather see more people come out and vote "no" then not vote at all.

Lower Turnout Results In Two Budget Defeats

Clearly, property owners no longer want to bear the burden of expenses while the state does not meet it’s responsibilities. Rising costs must be addressed by actions that do not include yearly increases of property owners’ taxes. The state of CT must meet its share of the educational costs, and other costs.

Town And School Budgets Fail At Referendum

This feels like an oddly misleading headline and narrative, particularly coming from the Editorial Board. The headline "Lower Turnout Results in Two Budget Defeats" pushes a misleading narrative regarding voter turnout, and then seeks to tie the outcome of the referendum to that misleading narrative. Sure, voter turn out for this year's referendum, 18%, was lower than last year's. However, last year's turnout, 25.4%, represented the highest turnout in the most recent 10 budget referendums. If you take the time to examine turnout percentages between 2017 and 2026 (2017: 19.9, 2018: 15.7, 2019: 17, 2020: 0, 2021: 8.98, 2022: 7.7, 2023: 8.8, 2024: 15.1/17.49, 2025: 25.4, 2026: 18), this year's turnout was actually the third highest in the past 10 cycles. Perhaps the headline of this article should say "Lower Voter Turnout Than Last Year", which is more accurate, rather than creating an impression that this year's turnout is some type of aberration - a narrative that the turnout numbers, in all their binary glory, simply do not support. Further, the headline of this article appears to tie the "lower turnout" to the defeated budgets. Sure, that could be true. But, perhaps, its more likely that Newtown residents are feeling the squeeze of multiple economic influences. In Newtown, we've experienced property revaluations and increased municipal spending. Eversource continues to raise rates. The state legislature gives PURA the authority to impose Public Benefit charges that benefit a tiny percentage of the public (and subsequently burdening the rest of us). At the national level, inflation has run rampant for years and many of those costs remain high to this day. In short, the data tells a far less dramatic—and far more honest—story than the headline suggests. This wasn’t an electorate vanishing in apathy; it was a fairly typical turnout delivering an verdict that, perhaps, some at the Editorial Board didn't like. At some point, it’s worth considering that residents aren’t confused, disengaged, or misled by turnout; they’re simply doing math at their kitchen tables and concluding that “no” is the only responsible answer left.

Enjoyed the forum which only confirmed my support for Brandon Moore as the Democratic candidate to run for the state representative position. Brandon Moore did not waiver about his duty to all the people, if elected, when an issue presents itself that requires that he voice a difference of opinion for the wellbeing of Newtown residents. If Michelle Ku’s 16 years have led to her loyalty being to other elected officials, as she implied, then Newtown is going to continue to witness actions that do not protect its residents. She could not unseat republican, Mitch Bolinsky, during a Blue Wave, and once again, will not do it now. Winning that seat is critical for all. That explains why her previous campaign committee now campaigns for Brandon Moore. It explains all the endorsements he has received from local elected democratic officials. It’s why we need Brandon Moore to be the democratic candidate to run for state representative.

Second Newtown DTC, League Of Women Voters Candidates Event Planned

Appreciated the opportunity to hear from both candidates as we were present for the College Dems forum but only heard from Brandon Moore. It was an opportunity to see who can unseat the Republican incumbent and there is no doubt that Brandon Moore should be the Democratic candidate. One concerned parent posed a question about discrimination unaddressed by the school district and interestingly enough, Michelle Ku, who proudly speaks of her Board membership years, said little, while Brandon Moore passionately addressed the issue along with his experience as an Apache Helicopter Commander. This family is supporting Brandon Moore. We need change and someone who is not afraid to disagree, especially about the rising costs of living in Newtown.

Log In

Date: Mon 06-May-1996

Leave a Reply Cancel reply