HARTFORD — Officials from the Fairfield Health Department have alerted the Connecticut Department of Public Health (DPH) that they received 12 calls from Connecticut residents who were instructed to c...
Families United in Newtown is planning its next meeting, to take place Sunday afternoon, to showcase the artistic and culinary talents of participants and supporters.
The return of the COVID vaccination van this week will have something new: the opportunity for children ages 5-11 to receive a Pfizer vaccination against the coronavirus.
Governor Ned Lamont and Connecticut Department of Public Health Commissioner Dr Manisha Juthani have announced that COVID-19 vaccines are now available to be administered in Connecticut to children ages 5-11.
With COVID-19 and its aggressive Delta variant still sickening residents with numerous symptoms that mirror influenza, Newtown Health District Director Donna Culbert is working harder to help educate community members in the hope that everyone will immunize themselves.
I’m honestly surprised Bruce had to look up what an “agreement in principle” means. After years of business experience and managing 200 people, I would have expected that term to be familiar by now. Hard to believe it’s a new concept at this stage in his career. Although rest assured Newtown, vote row A and when times get tough, we have Google to help the selectman.
I asked AI what does agreement in principle mean
An "agreement in principle" is a preliminary, non-binding understanding reached between two or more parties that outlines the fundamental terms of a future contract. It is considered a stepping stone toward a formal, legally enforceable agreement.
This type of agreement is used to establish mutual intent and a basic framework for negotiations before the parties commit to a detailed, final contract.
I think the Municipal part of the town should develop similar programs to identify strategies and measurable objectives thus driving even better results and possible efficiencies.
The commissioners literally said — in plain English — that because this is an 8-30g application, traffic isn’t a valid reason for denial. But sure enough, there’s Dave Ackert up there grandstanding about traffic again.
It’s almost like some folks will say anything to keep affordable housing out, even if it means ignoring state law and wasting everyone’s time.
Let us be honest: saying he’s “not afraid to cross party lines” because he switched affiliations to get on the ballot isn’t the same as actually doing something non-partisan once in office or on a commission. I haven’t seen any examples of him putting partisanship aside to get things done — only to get on the ballot.
