Date: Fri 10-May-1996
Date: Fri 10-May-1996
Publication: Bee
Author: KAAREN
Quick Words:
Chew-growth-strategies
Full Text:
with cut:Regional Planner Outlines Strategies To Manage Growth
B Y K AAREN V ALENTA
One of the best tools for controlling the aesthetics of residential
development is an open space subdivision law, according to a regional planner.
Jonathan Chew, executive director of the Housatonic Valley Council of Elected
Officials, said Newtown is one of the few HVCEO members that doesn't have such
a law already in place. Six towns - Bethel, Brookfield, Bridgewater, New
Milford, Ridgefield and Danbury - already have it in one form or another.
"Arthur Spector (former chairman of the Planning & Zoning Commission in
Newtown) wrote a draft proposal for one in the early 1980's but apparently
couldn't get anyone else interested," Mr Chew said. "What a difference an open
space subdivision law could have made in Newtown had it been in place for the
past few years."
Under existing regulations, Newtown can require a developer to set aside about
10 percent of the land for open space when a subdivision is approved. Under
the open space subdivision regulation recommended by Mr Chew, the size of each
approved lot also could be reduced slightly to provide more open space. A
two-acre lot, for example, might be trimmed to 1.75-acre or 1.6-acre. The
resulting open space is used to create a buffer zone along the road to shields
the subdivision from the view of passers by.
"People want privacy with a capital P," Mr Chew said. "Use the open space
alongside the road as an extra green. The primary purpose is for cosmetics -
not for animals or greenway - just for the aesthetics."
An open space subdivision law is good for three-acre zones and two-acre zones,
Mr Chew said.
"It's not a radical change in the size of the building lots - you hardly
notice the difference," he said. "But you need to start with big pieces of
land because once you are below an acre, the land won't support a septic
system that is guaranteed to work forever."
Open space subdivision is a subset of cluster housing, Mr Chew said, but he
dislikes using the term cluster housing because it often carries the
inaccurate connotation of "affordable housing."
"Ridgefield started planning years ago, making sure there is open space. They
have a cluster ordinance which they use," Mr Chew said. "One example is on the
border of New York state, a new very expensive subdivision - not affordable
housing at all, just done well. It's a cluster development with beautiful,
expensive homes - and with much more than 10 percent of the land set aside as
open space."
Mr Chew said that residents are more likely to accept the concept of the open
space subdivision when they know that it has already been done in Connecticut.
"Newtown stands out in not having done this," Mr Chew said. "A host of towns
have done it for years."
Another technique which has been used in some towns is transfer of development
rights (TRD).
"With TRD, a developer buys a piece of property near the center of town and
another in an outlying area," Mr Chew said. "The developer transfers the
development rights on the outlying property to the property in town where he
is allowed to develop, for example, one-third acre lots. He doesn't have to
give up ownership of the property in the country, but it cannot be developed."
The town of Sherman has a land trust which also has helped with the growth of
open space, Mr Chew said.
He explained that when a farmer or other landowner wants to subdivide a
property into building lots, some of the lots are donated to the land trust.
This charitable donation provides a tax shelter which reduces the impact of
the capital gains tax on the sale of the other building lots. The result is
almost the same for the property owner as if the entire property was divided
and sold for building lots.
"There's altruism in it, but the owners still get the money to give to their
heirs," Mr Chew said. "It comes out almost the same as if they divided the
land up and sold the whole thing."
State laws protecting streams and rivers serve as a basis for how much change
can take place in residential development, he said. Streams are classified as
"A" or "B" streams by the Department of Environmental Protection. Only "B"
streams can accept effluent from sewage treatment plants.
Most streams in Newtown are classified as "A" streams, prohibiting their use
as recipients of effluent. If high-density cluster housing is built on land
that won't permit individual septic systems, the development would need a
small package sewage treatment plant and one big leaching field instead.
"The hook on this is that the 15 or 20 homeowners are linked together into the
septic field," Mr Chew said. "Then you must have a homeowners' association
with minimum standards set by the state. If anything goes wrong, and the
homeowners' association can't fix it, the municipality is stuck with it. In
that case, cluster housing can become a liability."
An open space subdivision avoids this problem by not employing high-density
cluster development, he said.
"It's moderate (cluster development) and doesn't rock the boat too much."
Mr Chew said Newtown has hundreds of millions of dollars worth of real estate
which residents now are clamoring to preserve.
"What will it look like eventually under the existing planning and zoning
regulations? It will look like everywhere else," he said.
Mr Chew said he believes a building moratorium "of limited duration" can be
imposed while a town attempts to study and address a problem and put new
legislation in place. The problem has been the size of the task.
"It's always awkward to have to do something new in a municipality," he said.
"People are reluctant to take on a project like this which might balloon up to
consuming 10 percent of your time."
Develop one simple open space ordinance," he recommended. "Hire one person who
would be in charge of this process. Otherwise what you are doing is triage. If
this already had been done, Newtown would have an awful lot of green still
available."
