Date: Fri 13-Dec-1996
Date: Fri 13-Dec-1996
Publication: Bee
Author: ANDYG
Quick Words:
P&Z-Whispering-Pines
Full Text:
Third Version Of Whispering Pines Submitted To P&Z
B Y A NDREW G OROSKO
Whispering Pines, the controversial residential subdivision proposal that
ignited a string of public protests over the pace of local residential growth
- has been resubmitted in a third version for Planning and Zoning Commission
(P&Z) review.
Developers Thomas Maguire of Newtown and Larry Edwards of Easton, doing
business as PSD Partnership, are seeking approval for a 13-lot subdivision on
26 acres near Pine Street, Cherry Street and Narragansett Trail in Sandy Hook.
Bruce and Robert Biscoe of Hawleyville also are PSD partners.
P&Z Chairman John DeFilippe said Tuesday he expects the P&Z will act on the
latest version of Whispering Pines sometime in January or February. A public
hearing won't be held on the third version of the subdivision plans, he said.
The P&Z's review of the plans will involve gauging how closely the developers
have met the conditions of approval the P&Z placed on the project in
September, he said.
In September, P&Z members had a 16-lot version of Whispering Pines pending
before them. But due to many questions about the project's design, P&Z members
aprroved only 13 of those lots and placed many conditions on that approval.
Following the P&Z's 13-lot approval, PSD Partnership sued the P&Z in Danbury
Superior Court seeking to gain a 16-lot approval. That lawsuit is still
pending.
If the P&Z approves the new 13-lot proposal, the lawsuit would be withdrawn
from court by the developers. But if the P&Z turns down the 13-lot version,
the lawsuit would remain in effect.
In the latest version of Whispering Pines, the applicants have modified their
project to address some concerns raised by the P&Z.
But a sticking point between the P&Z and the developers is the commission's
requirement that PSD not seek to "re-subdivide" sections of the development
site after an initial subdivision plan is approved. P&Z members placed the
resubdivision ban on the property to limit the potential housing density at
the site and prevent more than 13 houses from eventually being built there.
The developers, though, maintain the P&Z is stepping outside its regulatory
bounds in banning any future resubdivision of the land.
Surface mining large amounts of sand and gravel at the site was one of the
most controversial aspects of the development proposal.
PSD's 13-lot construction plans indicate it wants to remove 37,500 cubic yards
of earth materials from the site, approximately the same amount of material as
was proposed under the 16-lot plan.
In an initial 19-lot proposal, which the P&Z rejected in April, PSD wanted to
remove approximately 50,000 cubic yards of sand and gravel.
Flashpoint
Whispering Pines has been one of the most controversial residential
development projects in recent memory. The 26-acre site lies within an
established neighborhood. Unlike some new home construction projects in areas
where there are few, if any, neighbors, the Whispering Pines site is in one of
the most densely-built sections of Newtown, with 85 individually-owned parcels
lying with 500 feet of the edge of the development site.
When initially proposed as a 19-lot development in April, residents of the
neighborhood, under the banner of the Rocky Glen Area Association, organized
and loudly opposed the project. They said new development there would: damage
the environment by the removal of an excessive amount of sand and gravel from
the property; overcrowd the neighborhood; jeopardize already-unreliable well
water supplies; worsen traffic hazards; and overburden the public schools,
among other complaints. P&Z members heeded the residents' concerns and
rejected the 19-lot development project in late April, citing concerns over
drainage, sedimentation, erosion, excavation and grading.
After PSD returned to the P&Z with a scaled-down proposal involving 16 lots,
the P&Z conducted public hearings on the project in June and July. The
developers said the 16-lot proposal addressed the concerns which were raised
by the P&Z in its rejection of the 19-lot plan.
Again, residents near the development site complained loudly.
On September 5, in a 4-to-1 vote, P&Z members reduced the 16-lot project to a
project containing 13 lots.
In its lawsuit, PSD claims that in attaching the many conditions to the
Whispering Pines approval, the P&Z acted illegally, arbitrarily, and in abuse
of the discretion vested in it.
The suit claims the P&Z's ban on any future re-subdivision of land within the
proposed subdivision isn't allowed by state law or the town's subdivision
regulations.
