Date: Fri 18-Aug-1995
Date: Fri 18-Aug-1995
Publication: Bee
Author: ANDYG
Quick Words:
sewer-assessment-taxation
Full Text:
Three Assessment Plans Presented For Sewers
B Y A NDREW G OROSKO
The Water Pollution Control Authority (WPCA) has proposed three possible sewer
assessment formulas to collect the $18.5 million town share of sewer system
construction costs.
Approximately one-third of the $30.4 million overall sewering project cost
will be covered by state grants.
Each of the three possible formulas distributes the financial burden of paying
sewer system capital costs somewhat differently among: residential sewer
users, non-residential sewer users, and town taxpayers with property not
served by sewers.
In an August 11 memorandum to the WPCA, Peter Grose, the project manager for
Fuss and O'Neill, Inc, the town's consulting engineering firm, outlined the
three alternative formulas, which he said are subject to change.
Depending upon which of the three assessment forumlas is used, the value of
"one residential sewer assessment unit" would be pegged at: $9,500, or $9,900,
or $11,000.
When the value of one residential assessment unit is set at $9,500, it would
financially benefit the residential sewer user, but would place the town's
property tax contribution toward the sewer system at the high end of the
municipal tax range among the three proposed sewer assessment formulas. In
this scenario, some 45.5 percent of the project's costs, also known as the
"total tax impact," would be covered by local property taxation. The total tax
impact includes the sewer assessments levied on town-owned properties.
When a residential sewer assessment unit is set at $9,900, there would be a
significant shifting of sewering project costs from general town property
taxation to non-residential sewered properties in comparison to the $9,500
sewer assessment model. The total tax impact in the $9,900 model would result
in 33.1 percent of project costs being covered by local property taxes.
In yet another sewer assessment model, a residential assessment unit would be
set at $11,000. Such an arrangement would have the lowest town property tax
impact of the three proposals. The total tax impact in this model reflects
25.6 percent of project costs being covered by local taxes.
A home with up to four bedrooms would be considered "one residential
assessment unit" or "one dwelling unit." A five-bedroom home would constitute
1.25 units, and a six-bedroom house would equal 1.5 units.
According to Fuss and O'Neill, there are about 814 properties which will be
served by sewer lines. Of that number 680 properties are residential and 134
properties are non-residential.
WPCA members have been reviewing aspects of possible sewer assessment formulas
for the past several years.
Components
There are several spending components covering sewer system construction and
operation.
Sewer assessments represent the amount of money that the owners of properties
with access to sewers will pay to the town across a 20-year period to cover
the cost of installing the sewers. The sewer assessments will be paid off by
property owners at a 2 percent annual interest rate made possible by a
government financing subsidy. The town also will accept lump sum payments to
cover sewer assessment charges.
Property owners with access to sewers will pay a sewer hook-up charge which
covers the costs of connecting residential and non-residential properties to
publicly-owned sewer lines. Hook-up charges vary depending upon the complexity
of the piping layout needed to connect the building to the sewer system, the
length of pipe required, and soil conditions.
Sewer users also will pay a sewer user charge based on the amount sewage they
discharge into the sewer system.
The WPCA plans to meet with the Legislative Council at the council's September
6 meeting to present the WPCA's final recommendation.
