Date: Fri 20-Mar-1998
Date: Fri 20-Mar-1998
Publication: Bee
Author: STEVEB
Quick Words:
council-budget-education
Full Text:
Move To Reconsider School Budget Cuts Fails
BY STEVE BIGHAM
Ed Lucas gave it his best shot Tuesday night in his attempt to have some Board
of Education funds restored to the 1998-99 budget. He was almost successful.
The rookie Legislative Council member felt his board had gone too far last
week when it cut $800,000 from the school board's original $32.7 request. At
Tuesday's meeting in the Newtown High School cafeteria, he suggested that the
council at least reconsider putting some money back. However, members' votes
were split down the middle, 6-6, killing the issue.
Those voting to reconsider the Board of Education proposal were: Joe Borst,
Tim Holian, Mr Lucas, Will Rodgers, Lisa Schwartz and Brian White.
Those voting against reconsideration were: Peggy Baiad, Karen Blawie, John
Kortze, Melissa Pilchard, Pierre Rochman and Donald Studley.
"The fact that we lost the vote doesn't bother me as much as the fact that the
issued was not even allowed to be discussed," Mr Lucas said later.
As council members cast their votes, a audible sigh echoed across the Newtown
High School cafeteria, populated mostly by school budget supporters, after
Peggy Baiad voted against Mr Lucas' request. Mrs Baiad, another first-year
council member, was considered by school supporters to be the swing vote, the
one council member who appeared to be on the fence.
"I was open," Mrs Baiad said Wednesday. "It was a very difficult decision. It
would have been easy to vote the other way in front of all those people, but I
had to do what I felt was right for the entire town. They're still getting a
7.4 percent increase."
Later in the evening, the council voted, 7-5, to approve the town's overall
budget of $58,753,278, which, if it stands, will show a tax rate increase of
about 1.1 mills.
Dozens of school supporters were on hand for Tuesday's meeting, hoping to sway
the council. Mrs Baiad said she received several phone calls from school
supporters Tuesday. She also ran into several other residents who were
concerned about the enormous size of the school system's request.
"You have to look at the whole picture," she said.
Mrs Baiad was the only non-member of the council's finance committee to vote
against reconsideration of the Board of Education budget.
As council members point out, the impact to the Board of Education would not
be $800,000. Last week's well-publicized vote actually called for a $500,000
cut and a lease of $411,000 worth of technology equipment (for $100,000),
netting another $300,000 in savings.
Of course, the idea to lease is only a suggestion by the council, which has no
line-item authority over school spending. The Board of Education will have the
final say on how it will handle the cuts, but the school board appears to be
leaning toward leasing. (See related story.)
The council's vote came after several members of the public urged the council
to reconsider its cuts.
NHS Principal Bill Manfredonia said the loss in funds would force him to cut
out some advisers and after-school activities. He added that a lack of
technology in the school is unfortunate, even if for only a year.
"We don't have the technology to fill the new building," he said. "Could we
wait a year? Yes, but how do you tell a student that we can't provide
technology this year -- 25 percent of that student's high school career."
NHS is also seeking to erect visitors' bleachers on the football field.
Visiting fans will likely be forced to stand this fall.
Mary Burnham of Walnut Tree Hill Road suggested the council make it easy on
itself by simply passing the school budget on to the voters -- untouched.
Another resident complained that the library's request ballooned by 62
percent, yet was cut just $20,000.
"The school budget was up 10.1 percent and you cut $800,000. Is that fair?"
she asked.
David Nanavaty of Currituck Road said leasing computers will only cost the
town more money in the long run.
