Date: Fri 21-Feb-1997
Date: Fri 21-Feb-1997
Publication: Bee
Author: SHANNO
Illustration: C
Location: A10
Quick Words:
Playing-Gibson-Russo-Sinise
Full Text:
(rev "Ransom" for Now Playing, 2/21/97)
Now Playing-
Overpromotion Probably Ruined A Great Big Payoff For `Ransom'
By Trey Paul Alexander III
There's nothing like starting off a column with a completely unrelated topic,
but have you ever noticed how Tom Cruise and Mel Gibson are the kings of
sprinting? Do they have contract clauses that call for at least one sequence
of them dashing determinedly toward the camera?
Think about it: Cruise in Mission: Impossible ? Running. Gibson in Braveheart
? Running. Cruise in Far and Away ? Running. Gibson in the Lethal Weapon
series? Running. Even in less obvious, less action-oriented films (Cruise in
The Firm and Jerry Maguire ; Gibson in Forever Young ), these two stars find
ways of high-stepping it. What's the point?, you ask. Well, this has been a
tangential thought, a random aside that only vaguely relates to this column
because of Gibson's starring role in Ransom - in which he has a running scene,
by the way - the focus of this week's review.
Ransom , playing at the Edmond Town Hall Theatre, is director Ron Howard's
follow-up to his rah-rah pleaser, Apollo 13 . Fairly early in this thriller,
in which the son (Brawley Nolte, yes, the son of Nick) of a wealthy couple
(Gibson, Rene Russo) is kidnapped and held for a $2 million ransom, it becomes
apparent Howard is attempting a grittier, more noirish tone with his latest
effort. If the thought of having one's offspring maliciously snatched and
threatened is not chilling enough, Howard dares to also present the abducted
child handcuffed to a bed in a dank room with electric tape across his eyes
and sinister music blaring on a boom box. No, not a pretty sight, nor one for
the faint of heart.
Though he shows signs of a harder edge here, over the course of his
directorial career, Howard has inarguably contended with his tendency towards
sugar-coating and sentimentality (or, in the case of Far and Away , pure
cornball). For the most part, his instincts for such do not undercut the grave
nature of the menacing crime depicted (except for occasionally awkward moments
of humor that would seem more at home in the morbid sensibilities of a Quentin
Tarantino flick than here), but the film does find itself partly undone by
another force: Not the director, but the Hollywood hype machine.
There needs to be a moratorium on any coming attractions or commercials that
seek to give away all the good parts of an upcoming motion picture. I know
show business and the bean counters want to create consumer awareness by
promoting their product, but I also imagine there will be long-term damage
done to the profitability of their motion pictures if they continue this
practice of divulging too much of a movie's content (ie, if I see that boy
gets girl during the commercial for a romantic comedy, then why would I pay to
go see the movie?).
Ransom boasts a fine cast that includes Gibson as the terrorized businessman
who will seek any means to get his son back; Russo (reunited with Gibson after
their pairing in the final Lethal Weapon offering, but under-used here) as his
distressed wife; Gary Sinise as a blue-collar New York City cop; and Delroy
Lindo as an FBI agent assisting the trauma-stricken family. They all gamely
invest themselves in this suspenseful brew, but the fact remains two of the
film's most intriguing plot twists (and I won't incriminate myself by naming
them, just in case there are folks out there who haven't seen the trailers
which spill the pivotal plot beans) are known to most viewers beforehand, thus
spoiling the shock value of the storyline's more fascinating inventions and
depriving audiences of the thrill of discovery.
Ransom , rated R for violence and profanity (definitely not for kids, nor the
weak-stomached parents), is a tense offering that still makes for diverting
viewing, but one wonders how much its potential impact was diminished by its
studio's overpromotion.
