Features

Opening Night For Town Hall Drive-In Was A Real 'Scream'

Published: Jun 26, 2026 8:00 am

Edmond Town Hall offered a screening of Scream as the first movie of its 2026 Summer Drive-In season.

Dozens of guests of all ages piled into vehicles of all sizes to catch the 1996 film that introduced moviegoers to Sidney Prescott and Ghostface. Screenings begin at dusk, but the parking lot at 45 Main Street opens 90 minutes earlier to allow for tailgating and picnics.

The 2026 Edmond Town Hall Drive-In series will continue this weekend with Nightmare on Elm Street on Friday, June 26. Our print and online calendars have listings through the end of the season; screenings are planned for most Fridays to September 11.

Admission is $20 per carload. A drive-in credit is issued for a future movie or event if a cancellation is required. Cancellations are posted by 6 pm each drive-in night.

Reservations and additional information are available at edmondtownhall.org.

Dozens of guests of all ages piled into vehicles of all sizes to catch the first movie of the 2026 Drive-In season at Edmond Town Hall on June 12. The new season continues most Friday evenings through mid-September. —Bee Photos, Glass

Becca Spaluen and Mike Auriana spent time wining and dining before the start of the movie Scream. —Bee Photos, Glass

Among those waiting to enjoy the movie on June 12 were, from left, Jake Guedes, Makena Brown, Nina Onofreo, and Nolan DeMelo. —Bee Photos, Glass

Edmond Town Hall Business Manager Lauren DiMartino and Executive Director Gary Lindemann welcomed guests to the showing of Scream at the start of the very popular summer drive-in movie series on June 12. —Bee Photos, Glass

Zimmerman's Fifth Book To Be Celebrated With Author Reception & Book Signing Event

Top Of The Mountain

Library's Semiquincentennial Programming To Continue With 'The Founding Mothers' Lecture

Newtown Lions Bringing Another Blood Drive To Town

Dave, you are right that only those in the Borough signed onto the law suits, as it was made clear during the Borough meetings that signers had to be residents of the Borough. However, as you know, there was a concerted effort by the Newtown Conservation Coalition to organize people (throughout town) and to orchestrate actions intended to foil the overall development. If one searches the Bee for “Newtown Conservation Coalition” one will find many articles and editorials that cite the coalition. More that 18 of those articles and editorials, from March 2024 through February 2025, are about the Castle Hill Development and include direct quotes from the NCC head/founder including, e.g.,: 1) Newtown Conservation Coalition founder Dave Ackert has sagely urged his fellow NCC members to “stick to the relevant regulations issues and concerns in your testimony,” as “general opinions and concerns will not be considered when making their decision." [https://www.newtownbee.com/08292024/borough-zoning-to-begin-20-60-castle-hill-public-hearing." [https://www.newtownbee.com/08292024/borough-zoning-to-begin-20-60-castle-hill-public-hearing] 2) “We’re being sold a lot of things,” said Ackert. “The developer said he is going above and beyond in preserving open space, but the only part [of the plan] that doesn’t have houses are the steep slopes. He’s not avoiding buildable land, he’s using every buildable inch.” [https://www.newtownbee.com/09272024/borough-zoning-hears-perspectives-on-castle-hill-development] In addition to the articles and editorials, you (Dave) also wrote over 8 letters related to the development, in essence speaking for the residents, e.g., saying “On behalf of hundreds of concerned residents living within 500 feet who signed protest petitions, and residents downstream who’s property and finances could also be negatively impacted, I ask the BOS to rescind the discontinuance decision now.” [https://www.newtownbee.com/07102025/discusses-rochambeau-trail-and-6-commerce-road] The main tools for the Newtown Conservation Coalition are FOI complaints and legal action. These actions have increased the amount both the Town and the Borough have had to pay for legal counsel over the last few years. The cost is shared by all households and businesses for Town actions. Unfortunately, it is shared by very few, relatively speaking, for Borough actions. This year’s Borough costs are $58,000 to date. There were FOIA/legal actions in 2024 and 2025 too. Eventually, we will all see if that was money well spent. My sense is that the answer is no.

What’s Going On In The Borough?

my concern is not limited to this single FOIA request or this one case. It is the broader pattern of obstructionism, fear-mongering, and personal nastiness reflected in your Facebook page and other public commentary. You routinely call people to action by presenting only one side of complicated issues, assigning the worst possible motives to those who disagree with you, and giving little consideration to the legitimate concerns or perspectives on the other side. That may generate outrage and attention, but it does not make you a constructive participant in Newtown’s civic affairs. You are entitled to question public officials and pursue whatever legal remedies are available to you. But you should not pretend that your own conduct, rhetoric, and repeated escalation of disputes have played no role in the hostility and expense surrounding these matters. Newtown would be a nicer and more productive community with less of this kind of divisive behavior.

My "actions" were a single request for audio recordings of public meetings. It would have cost the Borough ZERO dollars to turn those over, as required by law. Instead, the Chair of the Borough Zoning commission decided, unilaterally, without informing the rest of his commission, to fight that Freedom of Information request. Mr. Johnson attempt to deflect blame falls flat on its face here. Facts matter.

Can you name a single person involved in one of the lawsuits who does not reside in the Borough? I'll wait......

You do realize President Trump was born on June 14, the same date the US Army was founded. The parade was to honor the 250th anniversary of the United States Army. My uncle was a sergeant in the Army and was KIA 3 months before the war in Europe ended fighting the Germans. I'm happy there was an acknowledgement by the President for the brave men and women who are veterans of that branch. Too bad others don't honor them by insisting it was a "birthday parade". What an insult to our veterans! I'm not into cage fighting, but as far as being tacky or disgraceful, I would the UFC fight at the White House pales in comparison to Bill Clinton and an intern named Monica did during working hours.

Elections Have Consequences XXVI

Log In

Opening Night For Town Hall Drive-In Was A Real 'Scream'

Leave a Reply Cancel reply