Date: Fri 24-Jan-1997
Date: Fri 24-Jan-1997
Publication: Bee
Author: ANDYG
Quick Words:
P&Z-The-Estates-Taunton-Hill
Full Text:
Taunton Hill Development Plan Raises Questions About Frontage
B Y A NDREW G OROSKO
Planning and Zoning Commission (P&Z) members are considering how to apply a
subdivision regulation concerning lots with dual frontages to the resdidential
development proposal known as The Estates on Taunton Hill.
Da Mota, LLC, is seeking P&Z approval for 19 lots on 60 acres near Taunton
Hill Road, Taunton Ridge Road, and Great Hill Road.
But at a recent public hearing, P&Z Chairman John DeFilippe pointed out that
four of the lots in the proposed development have what are known as "dual
frontages."
An applicable regulation stipulates, in part, "Except in cases of unusual
topography or property lines, through-lots bounding on two generally parallel
streets will not be permitted."
At a January 16 session, Attorney Stephen Wippermann, representing Da Mota,
argued that the P&Z should allow all 19 lots requested by the developer.
Mr Wippermann pointed to previous cases in which the P&Z approved other lots
in other subdivisions where the same subdivision regulation concerning "dual
frontage" lots applied.
Mr Wippermann said the P&Z approved dual frontage lots in 1992 with the
generally parallel streets Founders Lane and Bennetts Bridge Road, finding
that the "unusual topography" was the presence of wetlands.
Also, many lots with generally parallel streets on two sides were allowed
along High Rock Road in 1979, he said.
Other examples he cited involve lots between Stonewall Ridge Road and Poverty
Hollow Road approved in 1988, and lots between Ridge Road and Boggs Hill Road.
As a possible development alternative to the subdivision plan for The Estates
on Taunton Hill, Mr Wippermann suggested that a proposed through-road there
known as Glenmor Drive be made a dead end road. But doing that would require
increasing the number of driveways intersecting with Taunton Hill Road to
maintain 19 lots in the subdivision, he said.
Adding driveway entrances along Taunton Hill Road would require removing
scenic barns from the site, he said. The developer would like to preserve the
barns, Mr Wippermann said, adding the plan that has been presented to the P&Z
indicates the most logical places to build roads.
Rear lots also would need to be created, the attorney added.
The plan which the developer presented to the P&Z on January 2 is "the best
development solution" for the property, according to Mr Wippermann. "This is
less an exception than has been granted (by the P&Z) in the past," he argued.
P&Z member Stephen Koch asked why the dual frontage lot matter wasn't brought
to the P&Z's attention by the developer at a January 2 public hearing.
Mr Wippermann replied the developer didn't think it was an issue.
Mr DeFilippe told P&Z members he has learned the developer doesn't need to
reach a road work agreement with the selectmen in connection with the
development proposal.
The P&Z is expected to act on The Estates on Taunton Hill at an upcoming
session.
Residents living near the site of the proposed subdivision told P&Z members
January 2 they are concerned that added development there will endanger
existing well water supplies, create traffic hazards, and pose drainage
problems.
At that session, resident Joseph Kelly of 103 Taunton Hill Road said with the
coming on The Estates on Taunton Hill, the area will lose its "country lane"
atmosphere. He urged P&Z members to make sure the development's design is in
accord with the town's plan of development. If the P&Z considers it necessary,
it should hire an independent consultant to analyze the subdivision proposal,
Mr Kelly said.
