Date: Fri 17-Oct-1997
Date: Fri 17-Oct-1997
Publication: Bee
Author: KAAREN
Quick Words:
Mile-Hill-water-contamination
Full Text:
STATE SAYS WATER AT MILE HILL CONSTRUCTION SITE NOT CONTAMINATED
BY KAAREN VALENTA
Groundwater at the site of the temporary bridge on Mile Hill Road at Fairfield
Hills does not appear to be contaminated with gasoline, a state environmental
official said Wednesday.
Greg Dorosh, project engineer in the DOT's Environmental Compliance Section,
said results of water quality testing did not show pollution so groundwater
treatment will not be required. But he said workers digging holes for new
bridge abutments last week did find a "pocket" of soil which appeared to
contaminated with gasoline.
"It was in the side wall of the excavation," he said. "They dug it out and it
may or may not have to be removed from the site."
David Anderson, the DOT's bypass inspector at the site, said Thursday that
"about three or four truckloads" of soil had been removed. The soil has been
removed to a storage area away from the river where it is sitting on plastic
sheeting and covered with plastic, he said. It eventually will be sent to an
approved hazardous waste disposal facility, he added.
Workers from the Dayton Construction Company of Watertown, the contractor for
the $3.2 million bypass road project, were digging footings for a new bridge
over the Pootatuck River when they discovered traces of gasoline in the soil
last month. At the time, they speculated that the rollover of a gasoline truck
at the on-ramp of I-84 at Exit 11 in October 1986 could be responsible. The
crash spilled 3,900 gallons of gasoline, part of which reached the river
located about 500 feet downhill from the ramp.
Mr Dorosh said the local and state health departments and the state Department
of Environmental Protection had been notified about the recent discovery of
the gasoline contamination. He did not believe the DEP had sent anyone to the
site, probably because it involved an old spill with little contamination and
because the DOT was handling the investigation.
"Essentially we saved the state some money," he said. "[The DOT] looked at our
results and was satisfied."
