Log In


Reset Password
Letters

Life Should Be Protected

Print

Tweet

Text Size


To the Editor:

This letter is in response to the Newtown Bee editorial of February 17 supporting “Aid In Dying.” I am in strong opposition to CT SB 88, which is another attempt to legalize assisted suicide.

Call it what you want, but SB 88 is not “compassionate,” but communicates to the terminally ill person that their life is no longer worth protecting and defending. This legislation has been defeated every year that it has been proposed, and it is my hope that this attempt at diminishing life will also fail.

There are many support systems available to the terminally ill, including palliative care and hospice. Our efforts should be directed at supporting the individual who is ill, through our prayers, assistance, and our simple presence. I had several experiences accompanying a loved one or friend in making the final days of their lives meaningful and valuable. It is a time of vulnerability, closeness, and love. In many ways, it is a time of holiness and grace — of tenderness and compassion.

Perhaps it makes us feel uncomfortable that we cannot control our own terminal illness. We don’t want to be a burden to our loved ones. Likewise, it troubles us to perceive that our loved one is in the process of dying. Could it be that it reminds us of our own mortality? Don’t we want our loved ones to accompany us in our final days?

Persons who are terminally ill are worth supporting and loving, even though it may be difficult. Their inherent value and dignity calls us to action to support them. Our state government should be focusing its efforts at supporting the terminally ill by increasing access to palliative care, hospice services, and by leading our citizens to defend all life, which has inherent merit and dignity.

Let us work together to find true compassion, rooted in love, hope, and tenderness.

Sincerely,

Patrick J. Gorman

Newtown

Comments
Comments are open. Be civil.
1 comment
  1. fab says:

    Respectfully, Mr Gorman, you are sadly uninformed about [how] medical aid in dying works — without abuse — in the ten states and Washington, DC where it is authorized. It most certainly IS compassionate and communicates to the terminally ill person that their final wishes are being respected, allowing them some choice over how and when they die. I have spent time with quite a few people who wanted aid in dying but could not have it for various reasons, just as I have spent time with others who were qualified for it and eventually DID use it. In EVERY instance, those who were eligible for it were grateful for the option to end their suffering in a manner they chose. For those who were eligible but ultimately did not opt to use aid in dying, they ALL described the peace of mind given to them by having the option if they wanted to use it.
    We allow patients to withdraw from life sustaining treatments at their own choice and should grant this related option to those who meet the criteria under the laws that exist and the one proposed in Connecticut. Let’s have those who would impose their opinions on others stand aside — pass SB88.

Leave a Reply