Date: Fri 01-Aug-1997
Date: Fri 01-Aug-1997
Publication: Bee
Author: ANDYG
Quick Words:
P&Z-Newtown-Village-hearing
Full Text:
August 7 Hearing Set On Newtown Village Plan
BY ANDREW GOROSKO
Newtown Village, the controversial 96-unit housing complex proposed for Sandy
Hook, will be the subject of the Planning and Zoning Commission (P&Z) public
hearing scheduled for 8 pm Thursday, August 7, at Newtown Middle School
auditorium, 11 Queen Street.
At the hearing, public comments will be sought on the proposal to build 96
single-family houses, 24 of which would be designated as "affordable housing."
The houses would be sold as condominium units under the terms of a "common
interest ownership community."
This application marks the first "affordable housing" proposal for Newtown. By
selling at least one-quarter of the houses as affordable housing, the
developers are entitled to employ a "density bonus" under which the state
encourages them to build more houses on the 32-acre site than is permitted by
town development regulations for an area with R-1 Residential zoning.
D&H Homes, LLC, of New Milford, and Fairfield 2000 Homes Corporation of
Stamford want to build Newtown Village at the site of a former sand and gravel
mine bordered on the west by the Exit 11 entrance ramp to Interstate 84, on
the northeast by Philo Curtis Road, on the south by Route 34, and on the
southeast by Bishop Circle. The site was used as a surface mine 25 years ago
during the construction of I-84. The applicants have options to buy the three
parcels which comprise the 32-acre site. Because the site has irregular
topography and steep slopes, it must be excavated and leveled for
construction, according to the applicants.
To make the site suitable for construction, the developers propose excavating
about 220,000 cubic yards of earth material and filling in the area with about
34,000 yards of material, resulting in a net removal of about 186,000 cubic
yards of material.
The site would be developed in five construction phases. Newtown Village would
be situated lower than abutting properties to minimize its visual impact.
Each house would have a garage with one or two bays. Three-quarters of the
houses would have three bedrooms. The remainder would have two bedrooms.
Twenty-one acres of the site would contains houses, roads and common areas.
The remaining 11 acres would have a detention pond, a community septic system,
wetlands and open areas.
Each yard and house would be individually owned, with the remainder of the
site commonly owned. Property owners in the development would be subject to
various ownership rules.
The developers state Newtown Village would pose no adverse effects on property
values in the area based on a real estate market analysis.
Last February, in the face of strenuous opposition from nearby property
owners, the Conservation Commission unanimously granted a wetlands
construction license for Newtown Village. At that time, the proposal included
102 houses.
The Sandy Hook Neighborhood Coalition, which was formed to oppose Newtown
Village when its wetlands application was pending before the Conservation
Commission, raised various environmental objections to Newtown Village.
In its decision, the Conservation Commission determined that the applicants
plan to take adequate steps to environmentally protect wetlands and
watercourses at and near the site.
Coalition members have expressed concerns that the P&Z will be constrained by
state regulations on affordable housing in the upcoming P&Z review of the
applicants' development plan.
Application
In their application to the P&Z, the developers seek a special exception to
the zoning regulations to build the complex.
Simultaneously, the applicants seek an amendment to the zoning regulations to
let them build a mechanized community septic system which would extract
nitrogen from wastewater before it's discharged into the ground. Current
zoning regulations don't allow "mechanized" community septic systems for
multi-family developments.
Last March, the developers sought Water Pollution Control Authority (WPCA)
permission to connect the site to the town sewer system, but the WPCA opted
against the proposal.
To handle increased traffic generated by the complex during morning and
evening peak hours, the applicants propose widening sections of Route 34. The
developers also propose modifying the timing at two nearby traffic signals on
Route 34, plus synchronizing the signals to allow the maximum amount of
traffic to flow through the area.
Main access to the property would be on Route 34, just east of the Exit 11
overpass. An emergency access road would extend to the site from Philo Curtis
Road.
The site would be served by a United Water service line built at the
developers' expense. Yankeegas would provide natural gas. The water line would
provide a 1,000-gallon-per-minute flow rate for firefighters, according to D&H
Homes.
The developers maintain there's no basis for the fire marshal's having
disapproved their proposed firefighting facilities. The fire marshal wants to
reserve the right to change proposed fire hydrant placements. The fire marshal
also wants the developers to provide an independent study on how fires would
be fought at the complex and what firefighting equipment would be needed to do
so.
The 24 affordable houses proposed for Newtown Village are intended for
families which earn 80 percent or less of the state's annual median income.
For a family of four, 80 percent of the median income is about $47,680. The
maximum sale price of an affordable home would be $140,200. Fairfield 2000
would help D&H Homes in the sales and marketing of the affordable houses.
The "market value homes" in the complex would be priced closer to $200,000.
The affordable housing is subsidized by the sale of market value homes.
Houses would range in size from 1,568 square feet to 2,088 square feet.
There are fifty-five properties lying within 500 feet of the development site.
Those property owners will be notified of the P&Z's upcoming public hearing by
the developers by mail.
Copies of the development application are available for public review at the
town land use office at Canaan House at Fairfield Hills.
