Date: Fri 26-Sep-1997
Date: Fri 26-Sep-1997
Publication: Bee
Author: ANDYG
Quick Words:
public-safety-committee
Full Text:
Public Safety Panel Tries To Regroup
BY ANDREW GOROSKO
Members of the Newtown Public Safety Committee met Tuesday and discussed ways
to revive the panel which members say has lost its bearings in recent months.
Even the legitimacy of the meeting itself was brought into question.
No notice or agenda for the meeting had been publicly posted as is required by
the Connecticut Freedom of Information Act.
The first selectman's office said that it had created past agendas as a
courtesy, but the task now has become the responsibility of the warden of
Garner Correctional Institution.
The warden's office said no content for an agenda had been forwarded to it by
the first selectman's office.
The public safety committee was created by an act of the state legislature to
keep open the lines of communication between the town, Garner, and the general
public. The panel meets on a quarterly basis to discuss safety issues stemming
from the presence of Garner, a high-security prison with 744 inmates, some of
whom are the most violent inmates in the state Department of Correction's
(DOC) prison system.
Since notice of the meeting hadn't been publicly posted, committee member
Wendy Beres informed members that the gathering simply amounted to a "chit
chat session" at which no action could be taken.
Committee member Sandra Michaud said that if she hadn't telephoned Ms Beres
that day, she wouldn't have known the committee was meeting.
Ms Beres, Ms Michaud and committee member Melissa Pilchard said the public
safety committee should be better organized to more effectively serve the
public interest. Ms Pilchard is a Legislative Council representative to the
committee.
Ms Beres urged that committee meeting minutes be more diligently kept and
distributed.
As she spoke, a DOC meeting clerk was taking meeting notes on a portable
computer.
Garner Warden Remi Acosta assured the women that a DOC clerk will generate
meeting minutes which would be available within a week.
Recollecting an April 1993 meeting and tour of the sprawling prison, Ms
Pilchard noted that the following day Garner experienced a major riot.
To which Warden Acosta asked, "So should we have these meetings any more?
Because the last thing I want is a riot."
When it was noted some members of the public won't attend safety committee
meetings because they are held at the prison, it was suggested the sessions be
held elsewhere, such as Edmond Town Hall or the expanded Booth Library.
Ms Beres picked up one of her crutches which had been leaning against the
meeting table and started banging it on the floor, asserting that Edmond Town
Hall is not handicapped-accessible and the expanded library has poor
handicapped accessibility.
Ms Beres urged that the committee hold a meeting in October when members will
decide how to organize the panel. That session is slated for Monday, October
20, at 5 pm in the warden's conference room at Garner.
Even though the Tuesday meeting technically wasn't a legal meeting, Warden
Acosta assured Ms Beres she would get a copy of the minutes, allowing her to
distribute them if she chooses.
Ms Pilchard told Warden Acosta committee members couldn't ignore that a safety
committee meeting was being held Tuesday and an agenda for it hadn't been
publicly posted.
Ms Pilchard termed the session an "hour-long chat" which wasn't actually a
meeting.
Besides Ms Pilchard, Ms Beres and Ms Michaud, other committee members
attending were Joy Previdi and John Roumanis, VMD.
First Selectman Robert Cascella, the committee's chairman, didn't attend the
Tuesday meeting.
On Wednesday, the first selectman said, "It was not a legally warned meeting
and I would not subject this administration to criticism by attending a
meeting that was not legally warned."
The state legislation which created the public safety committee requires that
it meet at least quarterly. The session held Tuesday was apparently conducted
to comply with that requirement.
