Council To Seek Expert Advice On Fairfield Hills' Environmental Status
Council To Seek Expert Advice On Fairfield Hillsâ Environmental Status
By Steve Bigham
The Legislative Council next month will meet with the townâs environmental professionals to discuss the extent of the contamination at Fairfield Hills. Members say they want to have all the facts before they proceed.
Earlier this month, two Newtown residents contended that the environmental problems at Fairfield Hills might run deeper than some reports have indicated. As Barry Piesner and Erwin Potter point out, the stateâs Phase II environmental study of Fairfield Hills was incomplete. They questioned the validity of the testing and wondered how much contamination is still unknown.
âThe Phase II study is like life and death to this town. If we donât know the full extent of the contamination weâre playing Russian Roulette with the townâs finances,â Mr Piesner said.
First Selectman Herb Rosenthal this week attempted to quell any fears that these new allegations may have brought about. He assured the council Wednesday night that his team of lawyers and environmental professionals are hard at work making sure Newtown does not get stuck with an environmental disaster there.
âI think we have a very strong position on the environmental issues at Fairfield Hills,â Mr Rosenthal said. âWe have a lot of arrows in our quiver to protect us on all issues.â
Mr Rosenthal acknowledged the Phase II study was not completely thorough. However, according to Mr Rosenthal, Russell Bartley, the townâs environmental consultant, âfelt the testing was sufficient and that a full-blown $200,000 Phase II study was not going to get us that much more information.â
The scope of the Phase II study was decided a year ago, back when the town was less interested in buying Fairfield Hills. As Mr Piesner alleges, the town and state may have figured private developers could foot the bill for any environmental testing they wished to do.
âIâm concerned that everything is based on the partial Phase II study,â said Council Chairman Pierre Rochman, pointing out that Mr Bartley declined to make any solid recommendations because the study was incomplete.
âIt should be noted that the current information is still limited and the cost of remediation for any particular area of concern could vary greatly,â Mr Bartley told the town after estimating that the total cost would be in the $12 million range.
That was of particular concern to member Ruby Johnson, who formally moved to have the town pay for a total Phase II study before issuing any requests for proposals (RFP). âFor us to go on without all the information puts us in a dangerous situation.â
Her motion did not receive a second.
Council member Will Rodgers said the council needs to trust Mr Rosenthal and his team as they negotiate with state officials.
âWe have paid professionals saying itâs okay,â he said.
Peggy Baiad agreed and urged her fellow council members to have faith in the negotiations. âNo one is saying weâre going to take the property âas is.ââ
The state had originally requested that negotiations over the sale of Fairfield Hills be completed by December 31. However, both the town and state agree that date will not be met.
At 9:30 pm Wednesday, the council entered into executive session, where Mr Rosenthal provided members with the strategy he is using to better the townâs buying position in light of these environmental concerns.
 David Elescu of Sanford Road also voiced concern over what he called âthe slap-dash quality of the Phase II report on such a critical issue.â
Bob Elias of Pebble Road agreed. âWhy should the State of Connecticut walk away from all the environmental problems which they created? We need to know what the absolute problems are.â
Richard Sturdevant of Westwood Terrace also voiced concern about the unknowns at Fairfield Hills.
In 1999, EnviroMed Services of New Haven estimated that the total cost to clean up Fairfield Hills would be between $16 million and $26 million. The environmental firm did the work for the development firm of Becker and Becker, which has shown a persistent interest in re-developing the former state mental health hospital.