It's Done: 6 Commerce Can Be Open Space
With the passage of omnibus appropriations bill, this means that Special Act Number 25.15, An Act Changing The Authorized Use Of A Parcel Of State Land Previously Conveyed To The Town Of Newtown, the controversial property 6 Commerce Road can now be used as open space. It is good to see this come to fruition as it seems to have a high amount of support among residents.
The text of the act is, "(a) Notwithstanding a certain restriction contained in the deed from the state of Connecticut to the town of Newtown dated July 16, 2004, and recorded in Volume 822 at Pages 632 to 638, inclusive, of the town of Newtown Land Records, which requires the town of Newtown to use the parcel of land described as Parcel B in said deed for economic development purposes only, said restriction is released, is relinquished and has no further force and effect, subject to the provisions of subsection (b) of this section.
"(b) The town of Newtown shall use said parcel for open space or recreational purposes only. If at any time the parcel is used for any purpose other than open space or recreation, the parcel shall revert to the state of Connecticut.
"(c) The State Treasurer shall execute and deliver any instrument necessary to carry out the purposes of subsections (a) and (b) of this section."
Among residents who disagree was one letter to the editor writer, who wrote a few weeks ago that the town was "walking away" from the tax revenue on a property appraised at roughly $4 million. Simpson raises some good points in his letter, but sometimes in difficult decisions, either decision has large upsides and the choice becomes which is more up-sidey, so to speak. Or at least which has broader support in the community. There's always a trade off.
The proximity of 6 Commerce to the Catherine Violet Hubbard Sanctuary as well as the Deep Brook watershed means that the property becomes part of a large swath of open space and natural beauty. The property helps protect Deep Brook, a Class A trout stream.
The 6 Commerce Road property was conveyed to the Town in 2003 for economic development, along with 8 Commerce Road, which was slated for open space.
In 2006, the town asked the state to reallocate a $500K STEAP grant from 6 Commerce and use it towards the Fairfield Hills property. In 2011, the Conservation Commission learned that paperwork from the Connecticut legislature, intended to convey the 34.44 acre property at 8 Commerce Road for open space, had been in the town’s possession since 2009. In 2014, the 34.44 acre parcel was conveyed to The Catherine Violet Hubbard Foundation for a sanctuary.
The Conservation Commission last year wrote a recommendation that said the group felt that the economic development parcel, located at 6 Commerce Road, should have been given to the CVH sanctuary, since it could count as economic development.
“In our view, the Hubbard Foundation should have received a parcel properly designated as economic development,” stated the recommendation. “It cannot be considered open space since it does not have the protections given to open space and is not town-owned property. It is a fact that our town lost out on the 34.44 acre open space parcel as originally intended by the state. It is also clear that the state gave serious consideration and direction that this parcel should be preserved as open space by inclusion of a requirement that the parcel would revert back to the state if not used for this purpose."
Members of the Board of Selectmen at its June 16 meeting expressed some concern over the language of the act, which states that the property is now required to be open space, or else ownership would revert to the state. Capeci conjectured it was likely because the wording was edited from the original act. Capeci intends to seek clarification as the text "changes the intent." The town sought to make open space an option for the property, while not yet looking to totally preclude economic development.
The town's boards and commissions will be discussing "next steps" for the property at future meetings.
The language “any purpose other than open space or recreation, the parcel shall revert to the state of Connecticut” is a bit concerning and warrants clarification. Would the existing infrastructure be violative of this language?
The devil is in the details, what constitutes recreation, a ice skating arena. A tennis club?
To be clear, there are different types of open space designations in the State of CT. The “Open Space or Recreation” designation simply means that the open space is open to the public for passive recreational activities (e.g., Hiking, Fishing, Horseback Riding, etc.), as opposed to the types of open space that are closed to the public. I’m confident that our terrific Conservation Commission will fulfill their responsibilities associates with Open Space land, as outlined by the town Charter, including the recommendation of specific rules on what’s allowed and what’s not for the Board of Selectmen to approve.
Also, make no mistake, the final language of the law is completely aligned with the resolution passed by a vote of 2-1 at the 10/7/24 BOS meeting. That resolution reads “….the Board of Selectmen will request that state legislators designate 6 Commerce Road as Town Open Space and request the economic development restriction be removed from the 6 Commerce Rd. deed…..”
Interestingly, on November 1st, the First Selectman wrote a letter to Mitch Bolinsky and Tony Hwang saying “….Following a resolution adopted by the Board of Selectmen on October 7th, and subsequently endorsed by the Legislative Countil on October 23rd, we seek to enact legislation that would remove the economic development stipulation from the deed of 6 Commerce Drive.”
Not only did he change the name from 6 Commerce Road to 6 Commerce Drive, but he also changed the request to suit his desire for the property instead of what was voted on, by omitting the part about designating it as open space! Thankfully, he attached the 10/7/24 BOS meeting minutes to his letter, where our state reps were able to reference the actual accurate resolution language, which again, matches the final language of Special Act 25-15.
The only clarification needed, is why the First Selectman changed the wording of his Nov. 1st letter, from what the BOS approved on October 7th.