Newtown’s First Relay For Life Needs Volunteers Now
A volunteer open house will be held on Monday, November 17, from 7 to 8:30 pm, in the Middle S...
Compass: A New Direction For A South Main St. Restaurant
By Kaaren Valenta
Steve Vazzano, executive chef and co-owner of The Three Bears restaurant in Westp...
Open Hearth Cooking
At Curtiss House
On Sunday, November 9, from 1 to 4 pm, The Matthew Curtiss House docents will demonstrate the complex art of cooking a comp...
Jazz Singer Carol Leigh
To Perform At Library
TRUMBULL — Carol Leigh, who performs glamorous performances in the style of a jazz singer from the 20s...
Watercolor Wednesday,
Easy As 1-2-3
Carmen Lund will be demonstrating in watercolor at a meeting of The Society of Creative Arts of Newtown (SCAN) on Wednesday,...
Paddlers Club Meeting, November 19
The Housatonic Valley Paddlers Club will hold its next meeting on Wednesday, November 19. The meeting will begin at 7 pm and...
Crafting Special Memories
For Fraser-Woods’ 35th Anniversary
By Larissa Lytwyn
 What do you remember most about your grade school days?
 For stu...
Scholastic Book & Craft Fair Coming To Fraser-Woods Montessori School
The Fraser-Woods Montessori School is having its first annual Scholastic Book and Craft Fa...
Jim Barbarie’s – Danbury’s Landmark Restaurant
In 1961 Jim Barbarie opened a restaurant at 47 Padanaram Road in Danbury, off...
Free Gun Locks Available From Police
The police department has received a supply of cable-style gun locks for distribution to the public.
Police will provide th...
Bruce, not a single member of the BOE (including GOP members, who I sense you are focused on here) initiated the action to have these books reviewed. It was a parent in town. So to insinuate that a political party (GOP) was guiding the hand of the BOE just isn't based in facts. I would counter that such an assertion is indicative of someone who is being hyper-partisan themselves.
Not to be overlooked, not a single member of the BOE, from either party, motioned to have the books removed. In fact, it was the GOP members who made motions seeking compromise to address the concerns of parents both in favor and against the books (i.e., keep the books but allow parents to opt-out of having them checked out by their children). That sure doesn't sound like national partisanship to me.
Emotionally charged is a good way to describe it. And if you’re in a public facing role as a volunteer, you need to develop a thicker skin. The majority of people in attendance at this meeting were incensed at the fact that four members were completely ignoring expert opinion, students, and a large contingent of their community. Were some people a little over the top, I think yes — but a very small minority in attendance. You and I saw the same thing but take away different views. Fine. I’ll respect your view. But I’ll agree to disagree.
Respectfully, I am sorry to hear what your child and family had to go through. But that is in no way an excuse for adults to bully other adults. Where do our children learn a bulk of their behaviors from? Adults. If adults act like bullies don’t you think that will influence some children to act like bullies?
And I would love to focus more on bullying in our schools - and force the school system to do more - but my comment, this article, and this whole controversy are not about bullying in school. I am simply calling out poor public behavior I see from my fellow adult neighbors.
mkmurphyphd: Vile is an overstatement for May 16; though the behaviors were definitely disrespectful. If you want a true display of “vile” behavior I IMPLORE you to watch the recording at the June 1 meeting. Watch 33:20-43:20.
This doesn't pass the smell test. Let's assume that the 2 of them were really on this quest for the children. If they had the votes, which they would have if the 4 voted together, then it would have been a shame for them to leave the day before the vote essentially sabotaging their own chances after working so hard for a desired outcome. Would it have really made a difference for them to wait one more day, get the vote they want, then step down? And if there was a credible threat, the police would be involved.
The way it looked to me is that the 2 remaining GOP board members were enthusiastic to vote for the final motion--not resigned to do so, or disappointed, or reluctant. They could have abstained in protest. But they didn't. It tells me that Larkin & Kuzma knew the vote wasn't going to go their way (probably because they became a liability after all those screenshots of ethics violations) and thought it best to move on.
Nice try though. I would guess someone going by the name "qstorm" would know a thing or 2 about mobs.