HARTFORD— Like all other institutions of higher education across the country, the Connecticut State Colleges and Universities (CSCU) recently announced it is na...
At The Newtown Bee, we are back at work on articles for our readers’ education and enjoyment, and remind you that subscribers get the first — and sometimes excl...
To ensure its community members are able to access the essential goods they need, Stop & Shop is launching same-day Pickup & Delivery service beginning on Wedne...
As the first day of June arrived, Newtown residents who may have gotten a little shaggier — or grayer — over the past couple of months without professional hair...
Following a growing chorus of reactions on the Minneapolis death of George Floyd, including those from Newtown's First Selectman and Police Chief, the Connectic...
The Newtown Bee will return to print on June 5.
The local paper temporarily suspended its weekly print publication in April due to the COVID-19 pandemic, as...
Shirley S. Lawrenson was born in Keam’s Canyon, Ariz., on the Hopi Reservation on August 23, 1934. Shirley and her identical twin sister, Sherry, were the daugh...
The Newtown Community Center, 8 Simpson Street, will offer a modified summer program schedule beginning Monday, June 22, including classes/programs such as danc...
To the Editor:
To the town I love so much I’m willing to push you, I write to you, a town who helped raise me and grow me to the woman I am and working on becom...
To the Editor:
I am a senior in high school during the COVID-19 pandemic. For four years I was building myself and learning about who I was. And then that proce...
I fail to see the Newtown connection in this nonconstructive partisan letter which apparently seeks to scare local seniors. Mr. Epstein's letter does nothing to further the conversation around a legitimate policy issue in the future of Social Security which according to SSA.gov "if trust fund assets are exhausted without reform, benefits will necessarily be lowered," citing lower birth rates. This is an area where we need an open and objective, multi generational, national dialogue, not fear based political propaganda.
I agree, thank you Richard. The example given by Ms. Murray illustrates that this is a state issue, not a town issue. If the same case occurred in Connecticut the plaintiff would have sued the state of Connecticut, not the town of Newtown.
What fun to have stumbled across this write up. As a friend of one of the daughters I was fortunate to have visited with them many times in the early 80s in various locations. A wonderful, adventuresome family!
The state constitution permits the lawful carry of firearms after proof of training and background checks. Local ordinances do not preempt state statutes and passing an ordinance for a problem that is non-existent as per the Newtown Police Department will undoubtedly result in the town incurring legal fees unnecessarily. Please see attached link for numerous legal precedents where municipalities failed when their respective ordinances were passed. https://ballotpedia.org/Firearms_preemption_conflicts_between_state_and_local_governments
Law abiding citizens do not violate laws and infringement on the Second Amendment is not going to make any community safer. Enforcing existing laws is what should be the focus regarding gun violence along with addressing the mental health crisis.
Richard Fisher, DDS
Newtown, Connecticut
