2 cols.
Wendy Shalen, “Vineyard Sunflower On Gold Silk,” 151/2  by 18 inches.
MUST RUN 5-11
GALLERY IN THE PARK PRESENTS WENDY SHALEN:...
2col (requested email 4-20 sandra) dss wanted 3 cuts, their agreement with penn says 1 photo per publication
2col
Irving Penn (b 1917), “Pablo Picas...
FOR 5-11
‘GEOMETRICS OF AGGRESSION’ OPENS AT CAVIN-MORRIS GALLERY MAY 17
avv/gs set 5-2 #698117
NEW YORK CITY — “...
FOR 5-11
PAUL KOLKER’S GARDEN VIEWS AT STUDIO 601 IN NYC MAY 17
avv/gs set #698664
NEW YORK CITY — Studio 601 announces Paul Kolkerâ...
2col leger.jpg (via mail)
Fernand Leger (French, 1881–1955), “Deux Brosses et un Saca de Main,” 1950, oil on canvas, signed ...
Tribal & Textile Art Show Will
Be Bigger And Better At 13
22 New Exhibitors At Caskey-Lees’ May 19–22 Show
all 1 col
Farrow Fine Ar...
FOR 5-11
BROOKLYN’S SLATE GALLERY TO PRESENT LIGHTING DESIGN, FABRIC MAY 18
avv/gs 5-2 #698672
NEW YORK CITY — Elizabeth Polish and Le S...
1col
“Study for a Cartouche,” by Pierre Edmè Babel (French, 1720–1775), pen and brown ink, brush and brown and gray wash, ...
2c #9 St. jpg
Gillot Saint-Evre, “Joan of Arc Kneeling before the Dauphin,” not dated, oil on board, Collection Stair Sainty Matthiesen,...
I think we are at this point because the objective was to confuse the voters to what was coming down the Pike. Who knew a 100% apartment building, who know no designation of how much commercxial, who realized they could also build two new Garages up to three stories high. The P&Z voted to omit any details in the regulations so now its up to the BOS. There really is no process for Publlic input because its ignored completely.
Your correct. In addition the P&Z does not take the time to digest public comment in the case of housing. last week they voted yes almost immediatley after public comment was finsihed to a significantly changed amendment from what the voters approved.
As I understand it, they would be allowed to have a single building that is completely residential, as long as they also do commercial somewhere else. Or they could put 160 apartments in a building and a single little office and that office would be “commercial” and qualify. Definitely attend. We are only at this point due to a misleading question on the November ballot.
My comments are apolitical. My point is that CT is not run well, regardless of the name of the party in office. It is underperforming almost all other states in the union with respect to the economy. People are not leaving just to retire. They're leaving to find jobs and that is a major concern for the future of the state.
I reiterate, MA and NY are generally run by Democrats. If CT people are fleeing CT for these states, then it is obvious that being run by Democrats is not the problem.
